Literature DB >> 19130056

Identification of prognostic factors for chronicity in patients with low back pain: a review of screening instruments.

M Melloh1, A Elfering, C Egli Presland, C Roeder, T Barz, C Rolli Salathé, O Tamcan, U Mueller, J C Theis.   

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is currently the most prevalent and costly musculoskeletal problem in modern societies. Screening instruments for the identification of prognostic factors in LBP may help to identify patients with an unfavourable outcome. In this systematic review screening instruments published between 1970 and 2007 were identified by a literature search. Nine different instruments were analysed and their different items grouped into ten structures. Finally, the predictive effectiveness of these structures was examined for the dependent variables including "work status", "functional limitation", and "pain". The strongest predictors for "work status" were psychosocial and occupational structures, whereas for "functional limitation" and "pain" psychological structures were dominating. Psychological and occupational factors show a high reliability for the prognosis of patients with LBP. Screening instruments for the identification of prognostic factors in patients with LBP should include these factors as a minimum core set.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19130056      PMCID: PMC2899092          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-008-0707-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  29 in total

1.  HKF-R 10 - screening for predicting chronicity in acute low back pain (LBP): a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Eva Neubauer; Astrid Junge; Peter Pirron; Hanne Seemann; Marcus Schiltenwolf
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2005-10-03       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 2.  Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work: evidence review.

Authors:  G Waddell; A K Burton
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.611

3.  Screening for yellow flags in first-time acute low back pain: reliability and validity of a Norwegian version of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire.

Authors:  Margreth Grotle; Nina K Vøllestad; Jens Ivar Brox
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  The INTERMED questionnaire for predicting return to work after a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Mike Scerri; Pierre de Goumoëns; Carlo Fritsch; Guy Van Melle; Friedrich Stiefel; Alexander So
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 5.  Lumbar disc disorders and low-back pain: socioeconomic factors and consequences.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Psychosocial variables in patients with (sub)acute low back pain: an inception cohort in primary care physical therapy in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Hans Heneweer; Geert Aufdemkampe; Maurits W van Tulder; Henri Kiers; Karel H Stappaerts; Luc Vanhees
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  How effective is the acute low back pain screening questionnaire for predicting 1-year follow-up in patients with low back pain?

Authors:  D A Hurley; T E Dusoir; S M McDonough; A P Moore; G D Baxter
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.442

8.  The LBP patient perception scale: a new predictor of LBP episode outcomes among primary care patients.

Authors:  Shmuel Reis; Jeffrey Borkan; Riki Vanraalte; Ada Tamir; Rachel Dahan; Doron Hermoni
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2007-04-23

9.  Development of a screening tool predicting the transition from acute to chronic low back pain for patients in a GP setting: protocol of a multinational prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Markus Melloh; Nikolaus Aebli; Achim Elfering; Christoph Röder; Thomas Zweig; Thomas Barz; Peter Herbison; Paul Hendrick; Suraj Bajracharya; Kirsten Stout; Jean-Claude Theis
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Differences across health care systems in outcome and cost-utility of surgical and conservative treatment of chronic low back pain: a study protocol.

Authors:  Markus Melloh; Christoph Röder; Achim Elfering; Jean-Claude Theis; Urs Müller; Lukas P Staub; Emin Aghayev; Thomas Zweig; Thomas Barz; Thomas Kohlmann; Simon Wieser; Peter Jüni; Marcel Zwahlen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  34 in total

1.  Best one hundred papers of International Orthopaedics: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Georgios N Panagopoulos; Cyril Mauffrey; Andrew Quaile; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Örebro Questionnaire: short and long forms of the Brazilian-Portuguese version.

Authors:  Felipe Ribeiro Cabral Fagundes; Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa; Fernanda Ferreira Fuhro; Ana Carolina Tacollini Manzoni; Naiane Teixeira Bastos de Oliveira; Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Chronic low back pain: course of disease from the patient's perspective.

Authors:  T Wolter; E Szabo; R Becker; M Mohadjer; S M Knoeller
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Prognostic occupational factors for persistent low back pain in primary care.

Authors:  Markus Melloh; Achim Elfering; Cathy M Chapple; Anja Käser; Cornelia Rolli Salathé; Thomas Barz; Christoph Röder; Jean-Claude Theis
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Does injury claim status and benefit status predict low back pain outcomes?

Authors:  Markus Melloh; Jon Cornwall; Rebecca J Crawford; Achim Elfering
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2015-08-31

6.  Predictive ability of a modified Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire in an acute/subacute low back pain working population.

Authors:  Charles Philip Gabel; Markus Melloh; Michael Yelland; Brendan Burkett; Anne Roiko
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Different minimally important clinical difference (MCID) scores lead to different clinical prediction rules for the Oswestry disability index for the same sample of patients.

Authors:  Julie Schwind; Kenneth Learman; Bryan O'Halloran; Christopher Showalter; Chad Cook
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2013-05

8.  Assessing Psycho-social Barriers to Rehabilitation in Injured Workers with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Development and Item Properties of the Yellow Flag Questionnaire (YFQ).

Authors:  Cornelia Rolli Salathé; Maurizio Alen Trippolini; Livio Claudio Terribilini; Michael Oliveri; Achim Elfering
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-06

9.  The predictive validity of OMPQ on the rehabilitation outcomes for patients with acute and subacute non-specific LBP in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Rainbow K Y Law; Edwin W C Lee; Sheung-Wai Law; Ben K B Chan; Phoon-Ping Chen; Grace P Y Szeto
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-09

10.  Relationship between STarT Back Screening Tool and prognosis for low back pain patients receiving spinal manipulative therapy.

Authors:  Jonathan Field; Dave Newell
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2012-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.