Literature DB >> 17334295

Psychosocial variables in patients with (sub)acute low back pain: an inception cohort in primary care physical therapy in The Netherlands.

Hans Heneweer1, Geert Aufdemkampe, Maurits W van Tulder, Henri Kiers, Karel H Stappaerts, Luc Vanhees.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of patients with episodes of acute or subacute low back pain, seeking physical therapy in primary care, with follow-up at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between psychosocial factors and the transition from acute or subacute low back pain to chronicity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Psychosocial factors have long been thought to be associated with chronic pain only. Recent prospective studies, however, suggest that these factors may also be important in acute or subacute low back pain.
METHODS: Demographic, psychosocial, and psychological baseline data were collected and analyzed from a sample of 66 acute or subacute patients with low back pain in order to predict the 3-month outcome.
RESULTS: After 3 months, response rate was 85% (56 patients). Forty-five percent rated their current status as "not recovered." Twelve percent reported work absenteeism. Using multiple regression analyses, baseline scores on the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire, Pain Coping Inventory, Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, and Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia were not significantly associated with non-recovery at 3 months. The only significant predictor at baseline was the subscale pain of the ALBPSQ, correctly classifying 80% of the patients. The relative risk for not being recovered was 3.72 (95% confidence interval, 1.63-8.52) for the subjects with high scores on the subscale for pain. Pain scores and scores on psychosocial variables at 12 weeks were not associated.
CONCLUSIONS: The study strongly revealed pain-related items to be essential factors in the development of chronicity and long-term disability in primary care physical therapy. Health status at 8 weeks seems crucial in developing chronicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17334295     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000256447.72623.56

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  30 in total

1.  Functional recovery following musculoskeletal injury in hospital workers.

Authors:  M Gillen; M G Cisternas; I H Yen; L Swig; R Rugulies; J Frank; P D Blanc
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 1.611

Review 2.  How is recovery from low back pain measured? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Steven J Kamper; Tasha R Stanton; Christopher M Williams; Christopher G Maher; Julia M Hush
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The Canadian minimum dataset for chronic low back pain research: a cross-cultural adaptation of the National Institutes of Health Task Force Research Standards.

Authors:  Anaïs Lacasse; Jean-Sébastien Roy; Alexandre J Parent; Nioushah Noushi; Chúk Odenigbo; Gabrielle Pagé; Nicolas Beaudet; Manon Choinière; Laura S Stone; Mark A Ware
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-03-10

4.  Prognostic occupational factors for persistent low back pain in primary care.

Authors:  Markus Melloh; Achim Elfering; Cathy M Chapple; Anja Käser; Cornelia Rolli Salathé; Thomas Barz; Christoph Röder; Jean-Claude Theis
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Acute low back pain and primary care: how to define recovery and chronification?

Authors:  Wolf E Mehling; Viranjini Gopisetty; Michael Acree; Alice Pressman; Tim Carey; Harley Goldberg; Frederick M Hecht; Andrew L Avins
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Inter-Professional Practices of Private-Sector Physiotherapists for Low Back Pain Management: Who, How, and When?

Authors:  Kadija Perreault; Clermont E Dionne; Michel Rossignol; Stéphane Poitras; Diane Morin
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 7.  Towards a theory of chronic pain.

Authors:  A Vania Apkarian; Marwan N Baliki; Paul Y Geha
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2008-10-05       Impact factor: 11.685

8.  The comparative prognostic value of directional preference and centralization: a useful tool for front-line clinicians?

Authors:  Audrey Long; Stephen May; Tak Fung
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

9.  Early patient screening and intervention to address individual-level occupational factors ("blue flags") in back disability.

Authors:  William S Shaw; Danielle A van der Windt; Chris J Main; Patrick Loisel; Steven J Linton
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-12-12

10.  Subgrouping low back pain: a comparison of the STarT Back Tool with the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.

Authors:  Jonathan C Hill; Kate M Dunn; Chris J Main; Elaine M Hay
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.