Literature DB >> 23179745

The predictive validity of OMPQ on the rehabilitation outcomes for patients with acute and subacute non-specific LBP in a Chinese population.

Rainbow K Y Law1, Edwin W C Lee, Sheung-Wai Law, Ben K B Chan, Phoon-Ping Chen, Grace P Y Szeto.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Early screening of physical and psychosocial risk factors has been advocated as a way to identify low back pain (LBP) patients who may develop chronic disability. This study evaluated the predictive validity of a Chinese version of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire (OMPQ) in identifying LBP patients at risk of developing poor return-to-work (RTW) outcomes.
METHODS: Altogether 241 patients with acute or subacute non-specific LBP agreed to participate, and they were screened at baseline with OMPQ, and evaluated after discharge from physiotherapy (n = 173) with outcome measures including the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), numerical pain score (0-10) and global recovery (0-10). At 1-year follow-up, information on RTW status as well as sick leave duration were obtained.
RESULTS: At baseline the OMPQ had a mean score of 112.0 (SD = 26.5). The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves of OMPQ scores at 1-year follow-up recorded values of area under the curve of 0.693 for RTW and 0.714 for sick leave duration, which are comparable to those reported in European studies. OMPQ was the only factor that could significantly predict the RTW outcomes, compared to other variables such as the RMDQ scores.
CONCLUSION: The results confirmed the predictive validity of the Chinese version of OMPQ in screening LBP patients at risk of developing poor occupational outcomes, and appropriate interventions can be arranged for these high-risk individuals in the rehabilitation process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23179745     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-012-9404-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  29 in total

1.  The role of fear-avoidance beliefs in acute low back pain: relationships with current and future disability and work status.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; Steven Z George; Anthony Delitto
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: patients consulting primary care for the first time.

Authors:  Margreth Grotle; Jens I Brox; Merit B Veierød; Bredo Glomsrød; Jan H Lønn; Nina K Vøllestad
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain.

Authors:  B W Koes; M W van Tulder; S Thomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-06-17

4.  Length of disability prognosis in acute occupational low back pain: development and testing of a practical approach.

Authors:  Glenn S Pransky; Santosh K Verma; Lee Okurowski; Barbara Webster
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain.

Authors:  S J Linton; K Halldén
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.442

6.  The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Paul Karoly; Sanford Braver
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

Authors:  M Roland; R Morris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire.

Authors:  Steven J Linton; Katja Boersma
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.442

9.  The influence of a continuum of care model on the rehabilitation of compensation claimants with soft tissue disorders.

Authors:  Brian Stephens; Douglas P Gross
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Do psychosocial factors predict disability and health at a 3-year follow-up for patients with non-acute musculoskeletal pain? A validation of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.

Authors:  A Westman; S J Linton; J Ohrvik; P Wahlén; J Leppert
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 3.931

View more
  7 in total

1.  Reliability, Construct and Predictive Validity of the Hong Kong Chinese Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.

Authors:  Raymond Tsang Chi Chung; Jamie Lau Sau Ying; Susane Kwong So Fong; Eric So Ming Loi; Rainbow Law Ka Yee; Thomas Wong Fu Yan; Edwin Lee Wai Chi
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-12

2.  Discriminative and Predictive Analysis of the Brazilian Version of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (ÖMPSQ) Short-Form in Patients With Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Fernanda F Fuhro; Felipe R C Fagundes; Ana Carolina T Manzoni; Cristina M N Cabral
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2022-04-06

Review 3.  Can screening instruments accurately determine poor outcome risk in adults with recent onset low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma L Karran; James H McAuley; Adrian C Traeger; Susan L Hillier; Luzia Grabherr; Leslie N Russek; G Lorimer Moseley
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 4.  Multidimensional screening for predicting pain problems in adults: a systematic review of screening tools and validation studies.

Authors:  Elke Veirman; Dimitri M L Van Ryckeghem; Annick De Paepe; Olivia J Kirtley; Geert Crombez
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2019-09-11

Review 5.  Framework for improving outcome prediction for acute to chronic low back pain transitions.

Authors:  Steven Z George; Trevor A Lentz; Jason M Beneciuk; Nrupen A Bhavsar; Jennifer M Mundt; Jeff Boissoneault
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2020-03-04

6.  Can the French version of the short Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire or its subsets predict the evolution of patients with acute, (sub) acute and chronic pain?

Authors:  Natalya Korogod; Arnaud Steyaert; Emmanuelle Opsommer; Anne Berquin; Olivier Nonclercq
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Predicting pain recovery in patients with acute low back pain: a study protocol for a broad validation of a prognosis prediction model.

Authors:  Fernanda Gonçalves Silva; Tatiane Mota da Silva; Gabriele Alves Palomo; Mark Jonathan Hancock; Lucíola da Cunha Menezes Costa; Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.