Literature DB >> 28887786

Assessing Psycho-social Barriers to Rehabilitation in Injured Workers with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: Development and Item Properties of the Yellow Flag Questionnaire (YFQ).

Cornelia Rolli Salathé1, Maurizio Alen Trippolini2, Livio Claudio Terribilini3, Michael Oliveri2, Achim Elfering3,4.   

Abstract

Purpose To develop a multidimensional scale to asses psychosocial beliefs-the Yellow Flag Questionnaire (YFQ)-aimed at guiding interventions for workers with chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain. Methods Phase 1 consisted of item selection based on literature search, item development and expert consensus rounds. In phase 2, items were reduced with calculating a quality-score per item, using structure equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis on data from 666 workers. In phase 3, Cronbach's α, and Pearson correlations coefficients were computed to compare YFQ with disability, anxiety, depression and self-efficacy and the YFQ score based on data from 253 injured workers. Regressions of YFQ total score on disability, anxiety, depression and self-efficacy were calculated. Results After phase 1, the YFQ included 116 items and 15 domains. Further reductions of items in phase 2 by applying the item quality criteria reduced the total to 48 items. Phase factor analysis with structural equation modeling confirmed 32 items in seven domains: activity, work, emotions, harm & blame, diagnosis beliefs, co-morbidity and control. Cronbach α was 0.91 for the total score, between 0.49 and 0.81 for the 7 distinct scores of each domain, respectively. Correlations between YFQ total score ranged with disability, anxiety, depression and self-efficacy was .58, .66, .73, -.51, respectively. After controlling for age and gender the YFQ total score explained between R2 27% and R2 53% variance of disability, anxiety, depression and self-efficacy. Conclusions The YFQ, a multidimensional screening scale is recommended for use to assess psychosocial beliefs of workers with chronic MSK pain. Further evaluation of the measurement properties such as the test-retest reliability, responsiveness and prognostic validity is warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Back pain; Occupational rehabilitation; Risk factors; Screening; Work

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28887786     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-017-9728-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  32 in total

Review 1.  Psychosocial approaches to the prevention of chronic pain: the low back paradigm.

Authors:  N A Kendall
Journal:  Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.098

2.  The SWAL-QOL outcomes tool for oropharyngeal dysphagia in adults: II. Item reduction and preliminary scaling.

Authors:  C A McHorney; D E Bricker; J Robbins; A E Kramer; J C Rosenbek; K A Chignell
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  When less is more. Data reduction in the prediction of postoperative outcome.

Authors:  Sallie Baxendale
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 2.937

Review 4.  Non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Chris Maher; Martin Underwood; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods.

Authors:  Mark P Jensen; Paul Karoly; Sanford Braver
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  Factor analyses for the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire for working and nonworking patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Remko Soer; Patrick Vroomen; Roy Stewart; Maarten Coppes; Patrick Stegeman; Pieter Dijkstra; Michiel Reneman
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire.

Authors:  Steven J Linton; Katja Boersma
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.442

8.  Longitudinal validation of the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ) in a Swiss-German sample of low back pain patients.

Authors:  Ralph Staerkle; Anne F Mannion; Achim Elfering; Astrid Junge; Norbert K Semmer; Nicola Jacobshagen; Dieter Grob; Jiri Dvorak; Norbert Boos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity.

Authors:  H Vernon; S Mior
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 10.  Can screening instruments accurately determine poor outcome risk in adults with recent onset low back pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma L Karran; James H McAuley; Adrian C Traeger; Susan L Hillier; Luzia Grabherr; Leslie N Russek; G Lorimer Moseley
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Treatment Efficacy, Clinical Utility, and Cost-Effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Biopsychosocial Rehabilitation Treatments for Persistent Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cornelia Rolli Salathé; Markus Melloh; Rebecca Crawford; Stephanie Scherrer; Norbert Boos; Achim Elfering
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-04-19

2.  Comprehensiveness and validity of a multidimensional assessment in patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Thomas Benz; Susanne Lehmann; Achim Elfering; Peter S Sandor; Felix Angst
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish Yellow Flag Questionnaire in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Meltem Koç; Zilan Bazancir; Hakan Apaydın; Burcu Talu; Kılıçhan Bayar
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2021-10-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.