Literature DB >> 16202634

HKF-R 10 - screening for predicting chronicity in acute low back pain (LBP): a prospective clinical trial.

Eva Neubauer1, Astrid Junge, Peter Pirron, Hanne Seemann, Marcus Schiltenwolf.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVES: To develop a short instrument to reliably predict chronicity in low back pain (LBP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Health care expenditures on the treatment of low back pain continue to increase. It is therefore important to prevent the development of chronicity. In Germany, there is at present no early risk assessment tool to predict the risk of developing chronic LBP for patients presenting with acute LBP. Undertaken in an orthopedic practice setting, this study examined known risk factors for chronicity. It resulted in the development of a short questionnaire that successfully predicted the course of chronicity with an accuracy of 78%.
METHODS: A cohort of 192 orthopaedic outpatients was assessed for clinical, behavioral, emotional, and cognitive parameters bsed on a self-report test battery of 167 established items predictive for chronicity in LBP. Chronicity was defined as back pain persisting for longer than six months. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive value of all items significantly associated with the dependent variable.
RESULTS: The study found the following items to have the strongest predictive value in the development of chronicity: "How strong was your back pain during the last week when it was most tolerable?" and the question "How much residual pain would you be willing to tolerate while still considering the therapy successful?" These were followed by the variables for "Duration of existing LBP" (more than eight days), the patient's educational level (low levels are related to higher risks of chronicity) and pain being experienced elsewhere in the body. Other significant factors were five items assessing depression (Zung) and the palliative effect of therapeutic massage (where a positive correlation was found). Female patients have a higher risk for chronicity, as do patients with a high total score on the scales assessing "catastrophizing thoughts" and thoughts of "helplessness".
CONCLUSION: Using the items listed above, the study was able to predict a patient's risk of developing chronic LBP with a probability of 78%. These items were assembled in a brief questionnaire and were paired with a corresponding evaluative tool. This enables practitioners to assess an individual patient's risk for chronicity by means of a simple calculator in just a few minutes. A validation study for the questionnaire is currently being prepared. MINI ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was the development of a brief questionnaire to assess the risk for chronicity for LBP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16202634     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pain        ISSN: 1090-3801            Impact factor:   3.931


  30 in total

1.  [Psychosomatic aspects in orthopedics].

Authors:  V Köllner; S Rupp
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Construct and predictive validity of the German Örebro questionnaire short form for psychosocial risk factor screening of patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Carsten Oliver Schmidt; T Kohlmann; M Pfingsten; G Lindena; U Marnitz; K Pfeifer; J F Chenot
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [Understand, investigate and diagnose pain in the musculoskeletal system].

Authors:  A Schulz; H Locher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Isometric non-machine-based prevention training program: effects on the cross-sectional area of the paravertebral muscles on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Lescher; B Bender; R Eifler; F Haas; K Gruber; S Felber
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 5.  [Pain prevention in the primary care setting : Facts for resident physicians].

Authors:  C Geber; B Kappis; T Bäsch; H R Casser
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  Low back pain: what determines functional outcome at six months? An observational study.

Authors:  Michele C Harms; Charles E Peers; Derek Chase
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Effects of multidisciplinary pain treatment can be predicted without elaborate questionnaires.

Authors:  Christian Alexander Fischer; Eva Neubauer; Hanne S Adams; Marcus Schiltenwolf; Haili Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  [Reduction in pain intensity after treatment for chronic back pain. When is it clinically meaningful?].

Authors:  A Mesrian; E Neubauer; M Schiltenwolf
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.107

9.  Subgrouping low back pain: a comparison of the STarT Back Tool with the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.

Authors:  Jonathan C Hill; Kate M Dunn; Chris J Main; Elaine M Hay
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.931

10.  Assessing a risk tailored intervention to prevent disabling low back pain--protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Jean-François Chenot; Michael Pfingsten; Ruth Anja Fahland; Gabriele Lindena; Ulf Marnitz; Klaus Pfeifer; Thomas Kohlmann
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.