Literature DB >> 11307688

Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work: evidence review.

G Waddell1, A K Burton.   

Abstract

There is increasing demand for evidence-based health care. Back pain is one of the most common and difficult occupational health problems, but there has been no readily available evidence base or guidance on management. There are well-established clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain, but these provide limited guidance on the occupational aspects. Occupational Health Guidelines for the Management of Low Back Pain at Work were launched by the Faculty of Occupational Medicine in March 2000. These are the first national occupational health guidelines in the UK and, as far as we are aware, the first truly evidence-linked occupational health guidelines for back pain in the world. They were based on an extensive, systematic review of the scientific literature predominantly from occupational settings or concerning occupational outcomes. The full evidence review is on the Faculty web site (www.facoccmed.ac.uk), but an abridged version is presented here to aid its dissemination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11307688     DOI: 10.1093/occmed/51.2.124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)        ISSN: 0962-7480            Impact factor:   1.611


  118 in total

1.  Chronic low back pain: patient had chronic rather than acute pain.

Authors:  Paul J Watson; Beverley Collett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-12

Review 2.  Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain: an international comparison.

Authors:  J B Staal; H Hlobil; M W van Tulder; G Waddell; A K Burton; B W Koes; W van Mechelen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Occupational asthma case finding: a role for primary care.

Authors:  Mark L Levy; Paul J Nicholson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Individual participant data meta-analysis of mechanical workplace risk factors and low back pain.

Authors:  Lauren E Griffith; Harry S Shannon; Richard P Wells; Stephen D Walter; Donald C Cole; Pierre Côté; John Frank; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Lacey E Langlois
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  [Analysis of spinal stress during surgery in otolaryngology].

Authors:  M Wunderlich; R Jacob; Y Stelzig; T Rüther; D Leyk
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  Managing low back pain in the primary care setting: the know-do gap.

Authors:  N Ann Scott; Carmen Moga; Christa Harstall
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 7.  A critical review of guidelines for low back pain treatment.

Authors:  Josep M Arnau; Antoni Vallano; Anna Lopez; Ferran Pellisé; Maria J Delgado; Nuria Prat
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Serum markers of collagen metabolism: construction workers compared to sedentary workers.

Authors:  J I Kuiper; J H A M Verbeek; V Everts; J P Straub; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 9.  Work-related outcome assessment instruments.

Authors:  Achim Elfering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Medical care of employees long-term sick listed due to mental health problems: a cohort study to describe and compare the care of the occupational physician and the general practitioner.

Authors:  J R Anema; K Jettinghoff; I Houtman; C G Schoemaker; P C Buijs; R van den Berg
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.