Literature DB >> 1886928

A normalization technique for 3D PET data.

M Defrise1, D W Townsend, D Bailey, A Geissbuhler, C Michel, T Jones.   

Abstract

Prior to reconstruction, emission data from a multi-ring PET camera must be corrected (normalized) for variations in detector sensitivity. The appropriate correction coefficients are obtained by measuring the response of all coincidence lines to a calibrated source of activity (a blank scan). State-of-the-art cameras may contain up to a million such lines of response (LORs), and therefore around 400 million counts will be required to calibrate each LOR to a statistical accuracy of 5%. Alternatively, by modelling the LOR sensitivity as the product of the individual detector efficiencies and a geometrical factor, a calibration procedure has been proposed which requires the determination of only 6000 parameters from this same data set. A significant improvement in the statistical accuracy of the coefficients can therefore be expected. Recently, multi-ring scanners have been operated with the septa retracted, increasing the number of measured LORs by a factor of eight. The acquisition of the calibration data necessary to achieve adequate statistical accuracy then becomes prohibitive. We show that, by modelling the LOR sensitivity, it is possible, with certain approximations, to normalize a septa-retracted emission data set with good accuracy. The input to the model is a high statistics blank scan acquired with the septa extended, which offers a number of practical advantages.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1886928     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/36/7/003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Performance evaluation of microPET: a high-resolution lutetium oxyorthosilicate PET scanner for animal imaging.

Authors:  A F Chatziioannou; S R Cherry; Y Shao; R W Silverman; K Meadors; T H Farquhar; M Pedarsani; M E Phelps
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  3D acquisition and reconstruction in positron emission tomography.

Authors:  D L Bailey
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.668

3.  Image Reconstruction for a Partially Collimated Whole Body PET Scanner.

Authors:  Adam M Alessio; Ruth E Schmitz; Lawrence R Macdonald; Scott D Wollenweber; Charles W Stearns; Steven G Ross; Alex Ganin; Thomas K Lewellen; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.679

4.  Simultaneous PET/MR imaging with a radio frequency-penetrable PET insert.

Authors:  Alexander M Grant; Brian J Lee; Chen-Ming Chang; Craig S Levin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Image reconstruction for PET/CT scanners: past achievements and future challenges.

Authors:  Shan Tong; Adam M Alessio; Paul E Kinahan
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2010-10-01

Review 6.  Deep learning-based image reconstruction and post-processing methods in positron emission tomography for low-dose imaging and resolution enhancement.

Authors:  Cameron Dennis Pain; Gary F Egan; Zhaolin Chen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Modelling Random Coincidences in Positron Emission Tomography by Using Singles and Prompts: A Comparison Study.

Authors:  Josep F Oliver; M Rafecas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.