Literature DB >> 19082847

A level-1 pilot study to evaluate of ultraporous beta-tricalcium phosphate as a graft extender in the posterior correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Thomas Lerner1, Viola Bullmann, Tobias L Schulte, Marc Schneider, Ulf Liljenqvist.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic results of ultraporous beta-tricalcium phosphate (beta-TCP) versus autogenous iliac crest bone graft (ICBG), through prospective randomized pilot study (EBM-Level 1), as graft extenders in scoliosis surgery. In the posterior correction of scoliosis, local bone resected as part of the procedure is used as the base bone graft material. Supplemental grafting from the iliac crest is considered the gold-standard in posterior spinal fusion. However, autograft is not available in unlimited quantities, and bone harvesting is a source of significant morbidity. Ultraporous beta-TCP might be a substitute for ICBG in these patients and thus eliminate donor site morbidity. A total of 40 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) were randomized into two treatment groups and underwent corrective posterior instrumentation. In 20 patients, ICBG harvesting was performed whereas the other half received beta-TCP (VITOSS) to augment the local bone graft. If thoracoplasty was performed, the resected rib bone was added in both groups. Patients were observed clinically and radiographically for a minimum of 20 months postoperatively, with a mean follow-up of 4 years. Overall pain and pain specific to the back and donor site were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). As a result, both groups were comparable with respect to the age at the time of surgery, gender ratio, preoperative deformity, and hence length of instrumentation. There was no significant difference in blood loss and operative time. In nine patients of the beta-TCP group and eight patients of the ICBG group, thoracoplasty was performed resulting in a rib graft of on average 7.9 g in both groups. Average curve correction was 61.7% in the beta-TCP group and 61.2% in the ICBG group at hospital discharge (P=0.313) and 57.2 and 54.3%, respectively, at follow-up (P=0.109). Loss of curve correction amounted on average 2.6 degrees in the beta-TCP group and 4.2 degrees in the comparison group (P=0.033). In the ICBG group, four patients still reported donor site pain of on average 2/10 on the VAS at last follow-up. One patient in the beta-TCP group was diagnosed with a pseudarthrosis at the caudal end of the instrumentation. Revision surgery demonstrated solid bone formation directly above the pseudarthrosis with no histological evidence of beta-TCP in the biopsy taken. In conclusion, the use of beta-TCP instead of ICBG as extenders of local bone graft yielded equivalent results in the posterior correction of AIS. The promising early results of this pilot study support that beta-TCP appears to be an effective bone substitute in scoliosis surgery avoiding harvesting of pelvic bone and the associated morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19082847      PMCID: PMC2899343          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0844-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  46 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of pedicle screw and hook instrumentation in posterior correction and fusion of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis.

Authors:  U Liljenqvist; U Lepsien; L Hackenberg; T Niemeyer; H Halm
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of bone grafts for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Charles T Price; John F Connolly; Anthony C Carantzas; Imran Ilyas
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Cadaveric allograft microbiology.

Authors:  T Ibrahim; H Stafford; C N A Esler; R A Power
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  H A King; J H Moe; D S Bradford; R B Winter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Allograft versus autograft in instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a randomized control trial.

Authors:  Suzy Gibson; Ian McLeod; Douglas Wardlaw; Stanislaw Urbaniak
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Pseudarthrosis after spinal fusion for scoliosis. A comparison of autogeneic and allogeneic bone grafts.

Authors:  B F Aurori; R J Weierman; H A Lowell; C I Nadel; J R Parsons
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Local autograft bone in the surgical management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Philippe Violas; Madeleine Chapuis; Henri Bracq
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Limitations of autograft and allograft: new synthetic solutions.

Authors:  Randal R Betz
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.390

9.  Adjunctive use of ultraporous beta-tricalcium phosphate bone void filler in spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  Gilbert R Meadows
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.390

10.  Use of a novel beta-tricalcium phosphate-based bone void filler as a graft extender in spinal fusion surgeries.

Authors:  Robert Gunzburg; Marek Szpalski
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  [The interspinous U implant (now Coflex): long-term outcome, study overview and differential indication].

Authors:  D Adelt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Poly(Thioketal Urethane) Autograft Extenders in an Intertransverse Process Model of Bone Formation.

Authors:  Madison A P McGough; Stefanie M Shiels; Lauren A Boller; Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz; Craig L Duvall; Joseph C Wenke; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 3.  [Bone substitutes in scoliosis surgery].

Authors:  T Lerner; H Griefingholt; U Liljenqvist
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Bone substitutes and expanders in Spine Surgery: A review of their fusion efficacies.

Authors:  Abhijeet Kadam; Paul W Millhouse; Christopher K Kepler; Kris E Radcliff; Michael G Fehlings; Michael E Janssen; Rick C Sasso; James J Benedict; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09-22

Review 5.  A systematic review of comparative studies on bone graft alternatives for common spine fusion procedures.

Authors:  Charla R Fischer; Ryan Cassilly; Winifred Cantor; Emmanuel Edusei; Qusai Hammouri; Thomas Errico
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Bone substitutes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery using sublaminar bands: is it useful? A case-control study.

Authors:  Sebastien Pesenti; Soufiane Ghailane; Jeffrey J Varghese; Matthieu Ollivier; Emilie Peltier; Elie Choufani; Gerard Bollini; Benjamin Blondel; Jean-Luc Jouve
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Use of graft materials and biologics in spine deformity surgery: a state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Ki-Eun Chang; Mohamed Kamal Mesregah; Zoe Fresquez; Eloise W Stanton; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-06-23

8.  [Gold standard for implant selection in operative therapy of spondylitis/spondylodiscitis].

Authors:  B Wiedenhöfer; S Hemmer; M Akbar; B Lehner; G Schmidmaier; C Klöckner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Silicate-substituted calcium phosphate as a bone graft substitute in surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Thomas Lerner; Ulf Liljenqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of extreme lateral approach to interbody fusion with β-tricalcium phosphate and hydroxyapatite composite for lumbar degenerative conditions.

Authors:  W Blake Rodgers; Edward J Gerber; Jody A Rodgers
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2012-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.