Literature DB >> 20454889

[The interspinous U implant (now Coflex): long-term outcome, study overview and differential indication].

D Adelt1.   

Abstract

The safety and effectiveness of the Coflex implant has been confirmed in a large retrospective data analysis. Further studies investigated the long-term clinical outcome up to 12 years and evaluated all associated complications showing a strong safety record. Prospective studies oversee only a small patient population at this point and exhibit scientific shortcomings. A large prospective, randomized, concurrently controlled multicenter trial is underway collecting data in seven spine centers in Germany. A similar study is being performed in the USA with a different control group regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). A differential indication is the stabilization of an adjacent segment next (above) to a fusion. Stabilization of a functional spinal unit after nucleotomy is not promoted by the author.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20454889     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-009-1589-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  5 in total

1.  Synovial cyst of spinal facet. Case report.

Authors:  C C Kao; S S Winkler; J H Turner
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Pseudocystic degeneration of the lumbar ligamentum flavum: a little known entity.

Authors:  Lukas M Wildi; Michael O Kurrer; Arnaldo Benini; Dominik Weishaupt; Beat A Michel; Pius Brühlmann
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2004-10

3.  Synovial cysts of the spine.

Authors:  B M Onofrio; A D Mih
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Experience with symptomatic spinal epidural cysts.

Authors:  S R Freidberg; T Fellows; C B Thomas; A C Mancall
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  A level-1 pilot study to evaluate of ultraporous beta-tricalcium phosphate as a graft extender in the posterior correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Thomas Lerner; Viola Bullmann; Tobias L Schulte; Marc Schneider; Ulf Liljenqvist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.134

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  ISASS Recommendations/Coverage Criteria for Decompression with Interlaminar Stabilization - Coverage Indications, Limitations, and/or Medical Necessity.

Authors:  Richard Guyer; Michael Musacchio; Frank P Cammisa; Morgan P Lorio
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12-05

2.  Superior outcomes of decompression with an interlaminar dynamic device versus decompression alone in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and back pain: a cross registry study.

Authors:  C Röder; B Baumgärtner; U Berlemann; E Aghayev
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion compared with motion-preservation procedures: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aixing Pan; Yong Hai; Jincai Yang; Lijin Zhou; Xiaolong Chen; Hui Guo
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Decompression and Interlaminar Stabilization for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Cohort Study and Two-Dimensional Operative Video.

Authors:  Olivia E Gilbert; Sarah E Lawhon; Twila L Gaston; Jared M Robichaux; Gabriel Claudiu Tender
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.948

5.  Posterior dynamic stabilization: The interspinous spacer from treatment to prevention.

Authors:  Antoine Nachanakian; Antonios El Helou; Moussa Alaywan
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.