Literature DB >> 27909654

Bone substitutes and expanders in Spine Surgery: A review of their fusion efficacies.

Abhijeet Kadam1, Paul W Millhouse2, Christopher K Kepler2, Kris E Radcliff2, Michael G Fehlings3, Michael E Janssen4, Rick C Sasso5, James J Benedict6, Alexander R Vaccaro2.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A narrative review of literature.
OBJECTIVE: This manuscript intends to provide a review of clinically relevant bone substitutes and bone expanders for spinal surgery in terms of efficacy and associated clinical outcomes, as reported in contemporary spine literature. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Ever since the introduction of allograft as a substitute for autologous bone in spinal surgery, a sea of literature has surfaced, evaluating both established and newly emerging fusion alternatives. An understanding of the available fusion options and an organized evidence-based approach to their use in spine surgery is essential for achieving optimal results.
METHODS: A Medline search of English language literature published through March 2016 discussing bone graft substitutes and fusion extenders was performed. All clinical studies reporting radiological and/or patient outcomes following the use of bone substitutes were reviewed under the broad categories of Allografts, Demineralized Bone Matrices (DBM), Ceramics, Bone Morphogenic proteins (BMPs), Autologous growth factors (AGFs), Stem cell products and Synthetic Peptides. These were further grouped depending on their application in lumbar and cervical spine surgeries, deformity correction or other miscellaneous procedures viz. trauma, infection or tumors; wherever data was forthcoming. Studies in animal populations and experimental in vitro studies were excluded. Primary endpoints were radiological fusion rates and successful clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 181 clinical studies were found suitable to be included in the review. More than a third of the published articles (62 studies, 34.25%) focused on BMP. Ceramics (40 studies) and Allografts (39 studies) were the other two highly published groups of bone substitutes. Highest radiographic fusion rates were observed with BMPs, followed by allograft and DBM. There were no significant differences in the reported clinical outcomes across all classes of bone substitutes.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear publication bias in the literature, mostly favoring BMP. Based on the available data, BMP is however associated with the highest radiographic fusion rate. Allograft is also very well corroborated in the literature. The use of DBM as a bone expander to augment autograft is supported, especially in the lumbar spine. Ceramics are also utilized as bone graft extenders and results are generally supportive, although limited. The use of autologous growth factors is not substantiated at this time. Cell matrix or stem cell-based products and the synthetic peptides have inadequate data. More comparative studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of bone graft substitutes overall.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allografts; autologous growth factors; bone substitutes; ceramics; demineralized bone matrix (dbm); hydroxyapatite; i-factor; osteogenic protein-1 (op-1); rhbmp-2; spine fusion; synthetic peptides; β tricalcium phosphate (β-tcp)

Year:  2016        PMID: 27909654      PMCID: PMC5130324          DOI: 10.14444/3033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  193 in total

1.  Cortical allografts in spinal tuberculosis.

Authors:  S Govender; K P S Kumar
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  A preliminary study of the efficacy of Beta Tricalcium Phosphate as a bone expander for instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusions.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2006-08

3.  Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft.

Authors:  Michael G Kaiser; Regis W Haid; Brian R Subach; Bryan Barnes; Gerald E Rodts
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  The use of allograft (and avoidance of autograft) in anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a critical analysis.

Authors:  A M Sarwat; J P O'Brien; P Renton; J C Sutcliffe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The outcome of allografts and anterior instrumentation in spinal tuberculosis.

Authors:  Shunmugam Govender
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The fusion rate of calcium sulfate with local autograft bone compared with autologous iliac bone graft for instrumented short-segment spinal fusion.

Authors:  Wen-Jer Chen; Tsung-Ting Tsai; Lih-Huei Chen; Chi-Chien Niu; Po-Liang Lai; Tsai-Sheng Fu; Kevin McCarthy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Radiographic assessment of interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2.

Authors:  J Kenneth Burkus; John D Dorchak; D Lynn Sanders
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  A prospective comparative study of radiological outcomes after instrumented posterolateral fusion mass using autologous local bone or a mixture of beta-tcp and autologous local bone in the same patient.

Authors:  Seongju Kong; Jin Hoon Park; Sung Woo Roh
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  RhBMP-2 is superior to iliac crest bone graft for long fusions to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity: 4- to 14-year follow-up.

Authors:  Han Jo Kim; Jacob M Buchowski; Lukas P Zebala; Douglas D Dickson; Linda Koester; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Bone union rate with recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 versus autologous iliac bone in PEEK cages for anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Charles-Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette; Amir Ghazanfari; Charlie Bouthors; Alexandre Poignard; Philippe Hernigou; Jérôme Allain
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  The future of disc surgery and regeneration.

Authors:  Zorica Buser; Andrew S Chung; Aidin Abedi; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  M6-C cervical disc replacement failure associated with late onset infection.

Authors:  Mary-Anne M Xia; Mark J Winder
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12

3.  Results of lumbar spondylodeses using different bone grafting materials after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

Authors:  Nicolas Heinz vonderHoeh; Anna Voelker; Christoph-Eckhard Heyde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Ceramic bone graft substitute vs autograft in XLIF: a prospective randomized single-center evaluation of radiographic and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Cristiano Magalhães Menezes; Gabriel Carvalho Lacerda; Germano Senna Oliveira do Valle; André de Oliveira Arruda; Erica Godinho Menezes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.721

5.  Comparative Efficacy of Commonly Available Human Bone Graft Substitutes as Tested for Posterolateral Fusion in an Athymic Rat Model.

Authors:  Neil Bhamb; Linda E A Kanim; Susan Drapeau; Suneeth Mohan; Erick Vasquez; Dan Shimko; William McKAY; Hyun W Bae
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-10-31

6.  A single center retrospective clinical evaluation of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion comparing allograft spacers to silicon nitride cages.

Authors:  Micah W Smith; Daniel R Romano; Bryan J McEntire; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-06

7.  Osteoinductivity and biomechanical assessment of a 3D printed demineralized bone matrix-ceramic composite in a rat spine fusion model.

Authors:  Mark A Plantz; Silvia Minardi; Joseph G Lyons; Allison C Greene; David J Ellenbogen; Mitchell Hallman; Jonathan T Yamaguchi; Soyeon Jeong; Chawon Yun; Adam E Jakus; Kenneth R Blank; Robert M Havey; Muturi Muriuki; Avinash G Patwardhan; Ramille N Shah; Wellington K Hsu; Stuart R Stock; Erin L Hsu
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 10.633

8.  High posterior cervical fusion rates with iliac autograft and Nanoss/bone marrow aspirate.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-07-20

9.  High lumbar noninstrumented fusion rates using lamina autograft and Nanoss/bone marrow aspirate.

Authors:  Nancy E Epstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-07-20

Review 10.  Spinal Biologics in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Y Chang; Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2018-04-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.