Literature DB >> 28540414

Bone substitutes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery using sublaminar bands: is it useful? A case-control study.

Sebastien Pesenti1,2,3, Soufiane Ghailane4, Jeffrey J Varghese5, Matthieu Ollivier4, Emilie Peltier4, Elie Choufani4, Gerard Bollini4, Benjamin Blondel6,7, Jean-Luc Jouve4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In order to avoid pseudarthrosis in adolescent idiopathic (AIS) patients, it is recommended to bring additional bone graft or substitute. Modern rigid instrumentations have been shown to provide less pseudarthroses even without bone substitutes. The aim of our study was to determine the impact of using bones substitutes on fusion rates in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing PSF with sublaminar bands.
METHOD: AIS patients scheduled to undergo PSF with sublaminar bands were prospectively enrolled into this study and not given any bone substitutes (no-substitute group). Data were collected and analyzed in patients with at least two years of follow-up. Pseudarthrosis was diagnosed if at least one of the following was present: persistent back pain, hardware failure, loss of correction greater than 10°. The results were compared to a control group who received bone substitutes for the same surgical procedure.
RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients were included. For the whole cohort, the mean age was 14.8 years old and the mean follow-up was 30.9 months. For the 'no-substitute' group (n = 44), the mean Cobb angle was 56° pre-operatively, 20.1° post-operatively, and 22° at final follow-up. The fusion rate was not statistically different between the two groups (97.7% vs 95.5%, p = 0.56). At last follow-up, one pseudarthrosis occurred in the 'no substitute' group and two in the control group. DISCUSSION: This is the first study to determine the impact of bone substitutes in AIS fusion using sublaminar bands. In our study, the use of local autologous bone graft alone resulted in a fusion rate of 97.7% despite the use of more flexible instrumentation. The high rate of fusion in AIS patients is more probably due to the healing potential of these young patients rather than to the type of instrumentation.
CONCLUSION: The use of additional bone graft or bone substitutes may not be mandatory when managing AIS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Beta-calcium triphosphate; Bone graft; Bone substitute; Pseudoarthrosis; Sublaminar bands

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28540414     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3512-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  27 in total

Review 1.  Bone grafting for spinal fusion.

Authors:  H S Sandhu; H S Grewal; H Parvataneni
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  Synthetic porous ceramic compared with autograft in scoliosis surgery. A prospective, randomized study of 341 patients.

Authors:  A O Ransford; T Morley; M A Edgar; P Webb; N Passuti; D Chopin; C Morin; F Michel; C Garin; D Pries
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-01

3.  Bone grafting techniques in idiopathic scoliosis: a confirmation that allograft is as good as autograft but dispels the purported pain associated with the iliac crest bone graft harvest.

Authors:  John G Devine
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  Outcomes Following Posterior Fusion for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis With and Without Autogenous Iliac Crest Bone Graft Harvesting.

Authors:  Charles H Crawford; Leah Y Carreon; Lawrence G Lenke; Daniel J Sucato; B Stephens Richards
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2013-03-15

5.  Hospital cost analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis correction surgery in 125 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Jonathan R Kamerlink; Martin Quirno; Joshua D Auerbach; Andrew H Milby; Lynne Windsor; Laura Dean; Joseph W Dryer; Thomas J Errico; Baron S Lonner
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The Universal Clamp hybrid system: a safe technique to correct deformity and restore kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Guido La Rosa; Giancarlo Giglio; Leonardo Oggiano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Bone morphogenetic protein use in spine surgery-complications and outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Antonio Faundez; Clément Tournier; Matthieu Garcia; Stéphane Aunoble; Jean-Charles Le Huec
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Efficacy and safety of posteromedial translation for correction of thoracic curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a new connection to the spine: the Universal Clamp.

Authors:  Keyvan Mazda; Brice Ilharreborde; Julien Even; Yan Lefevre; Franck Fitoussi; Georges-François Penneçot
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Prospective study of iliac crest bone graft harvest site pain and morbidity.

Authors:  David H Kim; Richard Rhim; Ling Li; Juli Martha; Bryan H Swaim; Robert J Banco; Louis G Jenis; Scott G Tromanhauser
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  How Sublaminar Bands Affect Postoperative Sagittal Alignment in AIS Patients with Preoperative Hypokyphosis? Results of a Series of 34 Patients with 2-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Sébastien Pesenti; Antoine Chalopin; Emilie Peltier; Elie Choufani; Matthieu Ollivier; Stéphane Fuentes; Benjamin Blondel; Jean-Luc Jouve
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  3 in total

1.  Pediatric Orthopaedics - from Kirschner wires to titanium.

Authors:  Patricia M M B Fucs; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Use of graft materials and biologics in spine deformity surgery: a state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Ki-Eun Chang; Mohamed Kamal Mesregah; Zoe Fresquez; Eloise W Stanton; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-06-23

3.  A Rationale for the Use of Clotted Vertebral Bone Marrow to Aid Tissue Regeneration Following Spinal Surgery.

Authors:  F Salamanna; D Contartese; G Giavaresi; L Sicuro; G Barbanti Brodano; A Gasbarrini; M Fini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.