Literature DB >> 12038843

Limitations of autograft and allograft: new synthetic solutions.

Randal R Betz1.   

Abstract

Autogenous cancellous bone is widely regarded as an ideal construct for graft procedures, supplying osteoinductive growth factors, osteogenic cells, and a structural scaffold. However, procurement morbidity and constraints on obtainable quantities limit its use. Allograft is the next best alternative at present; however, minor immunogenic rejection and risk of disease transmission are unresolved issues. Although synthetic grafting materials eliminate these risks, these materials do not transfer osteoinductive or osteogenic elements to the host site. To offer the advantages of autograft and allograft, a composite graft may be considered. Such a graft can combine a synthetic scaffold with biologic elements to stimulate cell infiltration and new bone formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12038843     DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-20020502-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  63 in total

1.  The incorporation of different sorts of cancellous bone graft and the reaction of the host bone. A histomorphometric study in sheep.

Authors:  P Leniz; P Ripalda; F Forriol
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Stem cell and tissue engineering research in the Islamic republic of Iran.

Authors:  Yousof Gheisari; Hossein Baharvand; Karim Nayernia; Mohammad Vasei
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.739

3.  Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy using 3D biomodelling Bonelike macroporous structures: case report.

Authors:  M Gutierres; A G Dias; M A Lopes; N Sooraj Hussain; A T Cabral; L Almeida; J D Santos
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  [Bone substitutes in scoliosis surgery].

Authors:  T Lerner; H Griefingholt; U Liljenqvist
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Biomimetic Approaches for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Johnathan Ng; Kara Spiller; Jonathan Bernhard; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 6.389

6.  Comparison of osteogenic potentials of visceral and subcutaneous adipose-derived cells of rabbits.

Authors:  Ioana A Peptan; Liu Hong; Jeremy J Mao
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Chitosan-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Sheeny Lan Levengood; Miqin Zhang
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 6.331

8.  In vivo behaviour of two different biphasic ceramic implanted in mandibular bone of dogs.

Authors:  Natalia Miño Fariña; Fernando Muñoz Guzón; Mónica López Peña; Antonio González Cantalapiedra
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 9.  Femoral osteolysis following total hip replacement.

Authors:  R Dattani
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  Role of Curcuminoids and Tricalcium Phosphate Ceramic in Rat Spinal Fusion.

Authors:  Daniel A Ryan; Jiongjia Cheng; Koichi Masuda; John R Cashman
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.