Literature DB >> 19064500

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Yuhong V Jiang1, Won Mok Shim, Tal Makovski.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the number of objects we can actively hold in visual working memory is smaller for more complex objects. However, complex objects are not just more complex but are often more similar to other complex objects used as test probes. To separate effects of complexity from effects of similarity, we measured visual memory following a 1-sec delay for complex and simple objects at several levels of memory-to-test similarity. When memory load was one object, memory accuracy for a face (a complex attribute) was similar to a line orientation (a simple attribute) when the face changed in steps of 10% along a morphing continuum and the line changed in steps of 5 degrees in orientation. Performance declined with increasing memory load and increasing memory-to-test similarity. Remarkably, when memory load was three or four objects, face memory was better than orientation memory at similar changed steps. These results held when memory for line orientations was compared with that for inverted faces. We conclude that complex objects do not always exhaust visual memory more quickly than simple objects do.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19064500      PMCID: PMC2699186          DOI: 10.3758/PP.70.8.1581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  38 in total

1.  The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception.

Authors:  M D ARNOULT; F ATTNEAVE
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1956-11       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 2.  The human visual cortex.

Authors:  Kalanit Grill-Spector; Rafael Malach
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  A configural effect in visual short-term memory for features from different parts of an object.

Authors:  Jean-François Delvenne; Raymond Bruyer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  Interference from filled delays on visual change detection.

Authors:  Tal Makovski; Won Mok Shim; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Attentional limits on the perception and memory of visual information.

Authors:  J Palmer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  Absolute identification with simple and complex stimuli.

Authors:  J N Rouder
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-07

9.  What causes the face inversion effect?

Authors:  M J Farah; J W Tanaka; H M Drain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition.

Authors:  M Moscovitch; G Winocur; M Behrmann
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  17 in total

1.  Independent sources of anisotropy in visual orientation representation: a visual and a cognitive oblique effect.

Authors:  Panagiota Balikou; Pavlos Gourtzelidis; Asimakis Mantas; Konstantinos Moutoussis; Ioannis Evdokimidis; Nikolaos Smyrnis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Quantity, not quality: the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity.

Authors:  Keisuke Fukuda; Edward Vogel; Ulrich Mayr; Edward Awh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

3.  The transition from feature to object: Storage unit in visual working memory depends on task difficulty.

Authors:  Jiehui Qian; Ke Zhang; Shengxi Liu; Quan Lei
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-11

4.  What are the units of storage in visual working memory?

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; Christopher L Asplund; René Marois
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  The number of attentional foci and their precision are dissociated in the posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Won Mok Shim; G A Alvarez; T J Vickery; Y V Jiang
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  What limits working memory capacity? Evidence for modality-specific sources to the simultaneous storage of visual and auditory arrays.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; René Marois
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Method matters: systematic effects of testing procedure on visual working memory sensitivity.

Authors:  Tal Makovski; Leah M Watson; Wilma Koutstaal; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Similarity effects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Hyejin J Lee; Anthony Asaad; Roger Remington
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

9.  Statistical learning induces discrete shifts in the allocation of working memory resources.

Authors:  Akina Umemoto; Miranda Scolari; Edward K Vogel; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Indirect assessment of visual working memory for simple and complex objects.

Authors:  Tal Makovski; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.