Literature DB >> 26226929

Independent sources of anisotropy in visual orientation representation: a visual and a cognitive oblique effect.

Panagiota Balikou1,2, Pavlos Gourtzelidis1,3, Asimakis Mantas4, Konstantinos Moutoussis2, Ioannis Evdokimidis4, Nikolaos Smyrnis5,6.   

Abstract

The representation of visual orientation is more accurate for cardinal orientations compared to oblique, and this anisotropy has been hypothesized to reflect a low-level visual process (visual, "class 1" oblique effect). The reproduction of directional and orientation information also leads to a mean error away from cardinal orientations or directions. This anisotropy has been hypothesized to reflect a high-level cognitive process of space categorization (cognitive, "class 2," oblique effect). This space categorization process would be more prominent when the visual representation of orientation degrades such as in the case of working memory with increasing cognitive load, leading to increasing magnitude of the "class 2" oblique effect, while the "class 1" oblique effect would remain unchanged. Two experiments were performed in which an array of orientation stimuli (1-4 items) was presented and then subjects had to realign a probe stimulus within the previously presented array. In the first experiment, the delay between stimulus presentation and probe varied, while in the second experiment, the stimulus presentation time varied. The variable error was larger for oblique compared to cardinal orientations in both experiments reproducing the visual "class 1" oblique effect. The mean error also reproduced the tendency away from cardinal and toward the oblique orientations in both experiments (cognitive "class 2" oblique effect). The accuracy or the reproduced orientation degraded (increasing variable error) and the cognitive "class 2" oblique effect increased with increasing memory load (number of items) in both experiments and presentation time in the second experiment. In contrast, the visual "class 1" oblique effect was not significantly modulated by any one of these experimental factors. These results confirmed the theoretical predictions for the two anisotropies in visual orientation reproduction and provided support for models proposing the categorization of orientation in visual working memory.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Generalized additive model for location; Shape and scale; Variable orientation error; Visual orientation accuracy mean orientation error; Visual working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26226929     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4379-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  38 in total

Review 1.  The psychophysics of perceptual memory.

Authors:  S Magnussen; M W Greenlee
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1999

2.  A systematic directional error in 2-D arm movements increases with increasing delay between visual target presentation and movement execution.

Authors:  N Smyrnis; P Gourtzelidis; I Evdokimidis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Toward a formal theory of flexible spatial behavior: geometric category biases generalize across pointing and verbal response types.

Authors:  John P Spencer; Vanessa R Simmering; Anne R Schutte
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  The "diagonal effect": a systematic error in oblique antisaccades.

Authors:  John D Koehn; Elizabeth Roy; Jason J S Barton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The haptic oblique effect in the perception of rod orientation by blind adults.

Authors:  E Gentaz; Y Hatwell
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-01

6.  Two independent sources of anisotropy in the visual representation of direction in 2-D space.

Authors:  Nikolaos Smyrnis; Asimakis Mantas; Ioannis Evdokimidis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals.

Authors:  S Appelle
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Perceived orientation of isolated line segments.

Authors:  H Bouma; J J Andriessen
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

10.  Discrimination of orientation by human infants.

Authors:  E A Essock; E R Siqueland
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  2 in total

1.  Laws of concatenated perception: Vision goes for novelty, decisions for perseverance.

Authors:  David Pascucci; Giovanni Mancuso; Elisa Santandrea; Chiara Della Libera; Gijs Plomp; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 8.029

2.  How the known reference weakens the visual oblique effect: a Bayesian account of cognitive improvement by cue influence.

Authors:  Renyu Ye; Xinsheng Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.