Literature DB >> 2142203

Attentional limits on the perception and memory of visual information.

J Palmer1.   

Abstract

Attentional limits on perception and memory were measured by the decline in performance with increasing numbers of objects in a display. Multiple objects were presented to Ss who discriminated visual attributes. In a representative condition, 4 lines were briefly presented followed by a single line in 1 of the same locations. Ss were required to judge if the single line in the 2nd display was longer or shorter than the line in the corresponding location of the 1st display. The length difference threshold was calculated as a function of the number of objects. The difference thresholds doubled when the number of objects was increased from 1 to 4. This effect was generalized in several ways, and nonattentional explanations were ruled out. Further analyses showed that the attentional processes must share information from at least 4 objects and can be described by a simple model.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2142203     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.16.2.332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  72 in total

1.  Measuring the effect of multiple eye fixations on memory for visual attributes.

Authors:  J Palmer; C T Ames
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-09

2.  Does precision decrease with set size?

Authors:  Helga Mazyar; Ronald van den Berg; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Spatial ensemble statistics are efficient codes that can be represented with reduced attention.

Authors:  George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The contents of visual memory are only partly under volitional control.

Authors:  Ingrid R Olson; Katherine Sledge Moore; David B Drowos
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-10

5.  Using a filtering task to measure the spatial extent of selective attention.

Authors:  John Palmer; Cathleen M Moore
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Variability in encoding precision accounts for visual short-term memory limitations.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Hongsup Shin; Wen-Chuang Chou; Ryan George; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Real and implied motion at the center of gaze.

Authors:  Alper Açik; Andreas Bartel; Peter König
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Visual short-term memory operates more efficiently on boundary features than on surface features.

Authors:  George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-02

9.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhang; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Accessing long-term memory representations during visual change detection.

Authors:  Melissa R Beck; Amanda E van Lamsweerde
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.