Literature DB >> 23965118

What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition.

M Moscovitch1, G Winocur, M Behrmann.   

Abstract

In order to study face recognition in relative isolation from visual processes that may also contribute to object recognition and reading, we investigated CK, a man with normal face recognition but with object agnosia and dyslexia caused by a closed-head injury. We administered recognition tests of up right faces, of family resemblance, of age-transformed faces, of caricatures, of cartoons, of inverted faces, and of face features, of disguised faces, of perceptually degraded faces, of fractured faces, of faces parts, and of faces whose parts were made of objects. We compared CK's performance with that of at least 12 control participants. We found that CK performed as well as controls as long as the face was upright and retained the configurational integrity among the internal facial features, the eyes, nose, and mouth. This held regardless of whether the face was disguised or degraded and whether the face was represented as a photo, a caricature, a cartoon, or a face composed of objects. In the last case, CK perceived the face but, unlike controls, was rarely aware that it was composed of objects. When the face, or just the internal features, were inverted or when the configurational gestalt was broken by fracturing the face or misaligning the top and bottom halves, CK's performance suffered far more than that of controls. We conclude that face recognition normally depends on two systems: (1) a holistic, face-specific system that is dependent on orientationspecific coding of second-order relational features (internal), which is intact in CK and (2) a part-based object-recognition system, which is damaged in CK and which contributes to face recognition when the face stimulus does not satisfy the domain-specific conditions needed to activate the face system.

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 23965118     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.5.555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  95 in total

1.  Recognition memory for faces: when familiarity supports associative recognition judgments.

Authors:  A P Yonelinas; N E Kroll; I G Dobbins; M Soltani
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-12

2.  Evaluating the neuropsychological dissociation evidence for multiple memory systems.

Authors:  Jennifer D Ryan; Neal J Cohen
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Dissociation of human and computer voices in the brain: evidence for a preattentive gestalt-like perception.

Authors:  Sonja Lattner; Burkhard Maess; Yunhua Wang; Michael Schauer; Kai Alter; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Recognizing the un-real McCoy: priming and the modularity of face recognition.

Authors:  Therese F Faulkner; Gillian Rhodes; Romina Palermo; Elizabeth Pellicano; Diane Ferguson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

Review 5.  Processing faces and facial expressions.

Authors:  Mette T Posamentier; Hervé Abdi
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 6.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces.

Authors:  Nancy Kanwisher; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Longer fixation duration while viewing face images.

Authors:  Kun Guo; Sasan Mahmoodi; Robert G Robertson; Malcolm P Young
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Sex-contingent face after-effects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces.

Authors:  Anthony C Little; Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Role of fusiform and anterior temporal cortical areas in facial recognition.

Authors:  Shahin Nasr; Roger B H Tootell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  The perception of a familiar face is no more than the sum of its parts.

Authors:  Jason M Gold; Jarrett D Barker; Shawn Barr; Jennifer L Bittner; Alexander Bratch; W Drew Bromfield; Roy A Goode; Mary Jones; Doori Lee; Aparna Srinath
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.