Literature DB >> 16873109

A configural effect in visual short-term memory for features from different parts of an object.

Jean-François Delvenne1, Raymond Bruyer.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that change detection performance is improved when the visual display holds features (e.g., a colour and an orientation) that are grouped into different parts of the same object compared to when they are all spatially separated (Xu, 2002a, 2002b). These findings indicate that visual short-term memory (VSTM) encoding can be "object based". Recently, however, it has been demonstrated that changing the orientation of an item could affect the spatial configuration of the display (Jiang, Chun, & Olson, 2004), which may have an important influence on change detection. The perceptual grouping of features into an object obviously reduces the amount of distinct spatial relations in a display and hence the complexity of the spatial configuration. In the present study, we ask whether the object-based encoding benefit observed in previous studies may reflect the use of configural coding rather than the outcome of a true object-based effect. The results show that when configural cues are removed, the object-based encoding benefit remains for features (i.e., colour and orientation) from different parts of an object, but is significantly reduced. These findings support the view that memory for features from different parts of an object can benefit from object-based encoding, but the use of configural coding significantly helps enlarge this effect.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16873109     DOI: 10.1080/17470210500256763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  12 in total

1.  What are the units of storage in visual working memory?

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; Christopher L Asplund; René Marois
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Object features fail independently in visual working memory: evidence for a probabilistic feature-store model.

Authors:  Daryl Fougnie; George A Alvarez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  A review of visual memory capacity: Beyond individual items and toward structured representations.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Configural representations in spatial working memory: modulation by perceptual segregation and voluntary attention.

Authors:  Leon Gmeindl; James K Nelson; Timothy Wiggin; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Shape and color conjunction stimuli are represented as bound objects in visual working memory.

Authors:  Roy Luria; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  The Gestalt principle of similarity benefits visual working memory.

Authors:  Dwight J Peterson; Marian E Berryhill
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

7.  Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Authors:  Yuhong V Jiang; Won Mok Shim; Tal Makovski
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-11

8.  Impaired executive functioning in subclinical compulsive checking with ecologically valid stimuli in a working memory task.

Authors:  Ben Harkin; Hannah Rutherford; Klaus Kessler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-05-03

9.  No evidence for binding of items to task-irrelevant backgrounds in visual working memory.

Authors:  Rob Udale; Simon Farrell; Christopher Kent
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-10

10.  Evidence for the beneficial effect of perceptual grouping on visual working memory: an empirical study on illusory contour and a meta-analytic study.

Authors:  Jiaofeng Li; Jiehui Qian; Fan Liang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.