Literature DB >> 19455288

[Hearing with combined electric acoustic stimulation].

U Baumann1, S Helbig.   

Abstract

After cochlear implantation, individuals with sufficient residual hearing in the lower frequency region are able to successfully combine acoustic and electrical stimulation patterns to improve speech perception, especially in noise, and to improve music appraisal as well. These improvements occur through enhanced transmission of fine structure information by more accurate mapping of the fundamental frequency contour through acoustic hearing. In current cochlear implant systems, the transfer of frequency and melodic contour is very coarse, and the correct detection of pitch contour requires large frequency differences. It is assumed that the acoustically transferred part of the signal enables the cochlear implant recipient to better segregate between speech signals and interfering sounds. The detection and following of a speech signal emitted by a single talker in a multitalker babble situation is improved when fundamental frequencies as grouping cues are present. The preservation of hearing in the implanted ear must be considered a major surgical challenge. The development of very flexible and soft electrode carriers in combination with surgical approaches that minimally traumatize the inner ear enable hearing preservation in nearly all cases.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19455288     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-009-1923-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  34 in total

1.  Unintelligible low-frequency sound enhances simulated cochlear-implant speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  Janice E Chang; John Y Bai; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Acceptance and fitting of the DUET device - a combined speech processor for electric acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Silke Helbig; Uwe Baumann
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

3.  Experimental sensorineural hearing loss following drill-induced ossicular chain injury.

Authors:  M Gjuric; W Schneider; W Buhr; S R Wolf; M E Wigand
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.494

4.  Temporal bone results and hearing preservation with a new straight electrode.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz; Timo Stover; Andreas Buechner; Gerrit Paasche; Robert Briggs; Frank Risi; Joerg Pesch; Rolf-Dieter Battmer
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  [Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique].

Authors:  E Lehnhardt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Noise exposure of the inner ear during drilling a cochleostomy for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Hans Wilhelm Pau; Tino Just; Matthias Bornitz; Nikoloz Lasurashvilli; Thomas Zahnert
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Reimplantation of hybrid cochlear implant users with a full-length electrode after loss of residual hearing.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Elad Sagi; Michael Jackson; William H Shapiro; J Thomas Roland; Susan B Waltzman; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Application of a corticosteroid (Triamcinolon) protects inner ear function after surgical intervention.

Authors:  Qing Ye; Jochen Tillein; Rainer Hartmann; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Jan Kiefer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Development and evaluation of an improved cochlear implant electrode design for electric acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Oliver Adunka; Jan Kiefer; Marc H Unkelbach; Thomas Lehnert; Wolfgang Gstoettner
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Effect of digital frequency compression (DFC) on speech recognition in candidates for combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS).

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Anthony J Spahr; Sharon A McKarns
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.297

View more
  4 in total

1.  [Simulation of speech perception with cochlear implants : Influence of frequency and level of fundamental frequency components with electronic acoustic stimulation].

Authors:  T Rader; H Fastl; U Baumann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Speech perception with electric-acoustic stimulation : Comparison with bilateral cochlear implant users in different noise conditions].

Authors:  T Rader
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Sensitivity to interaural time differences and localization accuracy in cochlear implant users with combined electric-acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Monika Körtje; Uwe Baumann; Timo Stöver; Tobias Weissgerber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Molecular mechanisms and roles of inflammatory responses on low-frequency residual hearing after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Juanjuan Gao; Haijin Yi
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2021-03-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.