Literature DB >> 12709676

A new method of partial deafness treatment.

Henryk Skarzyński1, Artur Lorens, Anna Piotrowska.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a significant group of patients whose hearing impairment is characterized by normal or slightly elevated thresholds in the low frequency band with nearly total deafness in high frequency range. These patients remain beyond the scope of effective treatment by hearing aids. We name this kind of hearing loss 'partial deafness'. CASE REPORT: A new method of partial deafness treatment was applied in the case of a young woman. A partially-inserted cochlear implant was used to restore hearing at high frequencies, while preserving low-frequency acoustic hearing in the implanted ear.
CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate a substantial improvement in speech discrimination and communication skills when electric stimulation on one side was combined with acoustic stimulation on both sides.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12709676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Monit        ISSN: 1234-1010


  27 in total

Review 1.  MED-EL Cochlear implants: state of the art and a glimpse into the future.

Authors:  Ingeborg Hochmair; Peter Nopp; Claude Jolly; Marcus Schmidt; Hansjörg Schösser; Carolyn Garnham; Ilona Anderson
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-12

2.  Electromotile hearing: acoustic tones mask psychophysical response to high-frequency electrical stimulation of intact guinea pig cochleae.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Kohei Kawamoto; Yehoash Raphael; David F Dolan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Combined acoustic and electric hearing: preserving residual acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Christopher W Turner; Lina A J Reiss; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  [Hearing with combined electric acoustic stimulation].

Authors:  U Baumann; S Helbig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Estimation of insertion depth angle based on cochlea diameter and linear insertion depth: a prediction tool for the CI422.

Authors:  Annett Franke-Trieger; Dirk Mürbe
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Optimizing the combination of acoustic and electric hearing in the implanted ear.

Authors:  Sue A Karsten; Christopher W Turner; Carolyn J Brown; Eun Kyung Jeon; Paul J Abbas; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Intracochlear recordings of electrophysiological parameters indicating cochlear damage.

Authors:  Oliver F Adunka; Stefan Mlot; Thomas A Suberman; Adam P Campbell; Joshua Surowitz; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Cochlear Microphonics in Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implantees.

Authors:  Artur Lorens; Adam Walkowiak; Marek Polak; Aleksandra Kowalczuk; Mariusz Furmanek; Henryk Skarzynski; Anita Obrycka
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.017

9.  Ganglion cell and 'dendrite' populations in electric acoustic stimulation ears.

Authors:  Helge Rask-Andersen; Wei Liu; Fred Linthicum
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

10.  Acoustic-electric interactions in the guinea pig auditory nerve: simultaneous and forward masking of the electrically evoked compound action potential.

Authors:  Kirill V Nourski; Paul J Abbas; Charles A Miller; Barbara K Robinson; Fuh-Cherng Jeng
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.