Literature DB >> 15657755

[Cochlear implantation with preservation of residual deep frequency hearing].

W Gstöttner1, S-M Pok, S Peters, J Kiefer, O Adunka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present paper is to evaluate the clinical parameters in patients implanted for combined, ipsilateral electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system.
METHODS: A total of 18 patients with residual deep frequency hearing were implanted with a Combi 40+cochlear implant (MED-EL, Austria). Insertion depths ranged from 18 to 22 mm (360 degrees ). A modified surgical technique should contribute to hearing preservation in low frequency regions of the cochlea. Pure-tone audiometric thresholds were measured pre- and postoperatively. A speech audiometric evaluation was performed on two subjects.
RESULTS: Utilizing adapted surgical procedures, the preservation of low frequency hearing was accomplished in 16 of 18 subjects (88.9%). Seven (38.9%) patients had complete and nine (50.0%) partial preservation of residual hearing. The speech discrimination scores of two patients documented an increase in sentence intelligibility when compared with only the cochlear implant.
CONCLUSIONS: Hearing preservation in cochlear implant surgery is possible. Insertions of 360 degrees provide a full functioning cochlear implant to stimulate sufficient neural structures for above average discrimination scores with the implant alone. A synergistic effect of the electric and the acoustic stimulation modes leads to high discrimination scores in background noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15657755     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-004-1170-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  20 in total

1.  Chronic electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant promotes survival of spiral ganglion neurons after neonatal deafness.

Authors:  P A Leake; G T Hradek; R L Snyder
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1999-10-04       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Comparison of electrode position in the human cochlea using various perimodiolar electrode arrays.

Authors:  M Tykocinski; L T Cohen; B C Pyman; T Roland; C Treaba; J Palamara; M C Dahm; R K Shepherd; J Xu; R S Cowan; N L Cohen; G M Clark
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-03

3.  Recent results with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant and TEMPO+ behind-the-ear processor.

Authors:  Ilona Anderson; Viktor Weichbold; Patrick D'Haese
Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.697

4.  Perimodiolar electrodes in cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  W K Gstoettner; O Adunka; P Franz; J Hamzavi; H Plenk; M Susani; W Baumgartner; J Kiefer
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Cochlear structures after implantation of a perimodiolar electrode array.

Authors:  B Richter; K Jaekel; A Aschendorff; N Marangos; R Laszig
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Cochlear implant deep-insertion surgery.

Authors:  W K Gstoettner; W D Baumgartner; P Franz; J Hamzavi
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  [Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique].

Authors:  E Lehnhardt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 8.  Pharmacologic treatment of inner ear: from basic science to the patient.

Authors:  P P Lefebvre; H Staecker; T Van de Water; G Moonen; B Malgrange
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg       Date:  2002

9.  Speech discrimination scores of postlingually deaf adults implanted with the Combi 40 cochlear implant.

Authors:  W K Gstoettner; J Hamzavi; W D Baumgartner
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  Development and evaluation of an improved cochlear implant electrode design for electric acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Oliver Adunka; Jan Kiefer; Marc H Unkelbach; Thomas Lehnert; Wolfgang Gstoettner
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  6 in total

1.  [Present state of cochlear implant treatment in adults and children].

Authors:  J Maurer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Early Hearing Preservation Outcomes Following Cochlear Implantation With New Slim Lateral Wall Electrode Using Electrocochleography.

Authors:  Amit Walia; Matthew A Shew; Abhinav Ettyreddy; Shannon M Lefler; Pawina Jiramongkolchai; Cameron C Wick; Nedim Durakovic; Craig A Buchman; Jacques A Herzog
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 3.  Psychophysical properties of low-frequency hearing: implications for perceiving speech and music via electric and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

4.  THE PSYCHOPHYSICS OF LOW-FREQUENCY ACOUSTIC HEARING IN ELECTRIC AND ACOUSTIC STIMULATION (EAS) AND BIMODAL PATIENTS.

Authors:  Rene H Gifford; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Hear Sci       Date:  2012-05-01

5.  [Transplantation of neural stem cells into the cochlea].

Authors:  I Nagy; S Fuchs; A Monge; A Huber; D Bodmer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.330

6.  Hearing preservation surgery: psychophysical estimates of cochlear damage in recipients of a short electrode array.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Anthony J Spahr; Sid P Bacon; Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.482

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.