Literature DB >> 1490902

Frequency selectivity in workers with noise-induced hearing loss.

C Laroche1, R Hétu, H T Quoc, B Josserand, B Glasberg.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken in order to document, in a group of subjects affected by a noise-induced hearing loss, the relation between the loss of auditory sensitivity and the loss of frequency selectivity at mid-frequencies, namely 1000 and 3000 Hz. Auditory filter shapes were estimated using the notched noise method. Twelve notch widths were tested, six symmetrical and six asymmetrical with respect to the signal frequency; the spectral level of the noise was set at 50 dB SPL. Data were collected with 22 noise-exposed workers having different degrees of hearing loss. The findings indicate that above a certain degree of hearing loss, which seems to be around 30 dB HL, frequency selectivity tends to decrease linearly with increase in loss of sensitivity. Even when the degree of hearing loss is similar in origin and in magnitude, there is a wide variation among subjects in auditory filter bandwidth. Based on the data collected in this study, it is not possible to adequately predict the auditory filter bandwidth of an individual from hearing threshold levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1490902     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(92)90168-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  10 in total

1.  Toward Routine Assessments of Auditory Filter Shape.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Allison B Kern; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 2.  The Physiologic and Psychophysical Consequences of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

3.  Relationship Among Signal Fidelity, Hearing Loss, and Working Memory for Digital Noise Suppression.

Authors:  Kathryn Arehart; Pamela Souza; James Kates; Thomas Lunner; Michael Syskind Pedersen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 4.  Psychophysical properties of low-frequency hearing: implications for perceiving speech and music via electric and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Christopher A Brown
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-25

5.  Auditory function and speech understanding in listeners who qualify for EAS surgery.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Anthony J Spahr; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss.

Authors:  Evelyn Davies-Venn; Pamela Souza; Marc Brennan; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  THE PSYCHOPHYSICS OF LOW-FREQUENCY ACOUSTIC HEARING IN ELECTRIC AND ACOUSTIC STIMULATION (EAS) AND BIMODAL PATIENTS.

Authors:  Rene H Gifford; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  J Hear Sci       Date:  2012-05-01

8.  Changes in audiometric threshold and frequency selectivity correlate with cochlear histopathology in macaque monkeys with permanent noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Jane A Burton; Chase A Mackey; Kaitlyn S MacDonald; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Occupational hearing loss of the workmen of an open cast chromite mines.

Authors:  Sunamani Kerketta; Rajendra Gartia; Somanath Bagh
Journal:  Indian J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2012-01

10.  Hearing preservation surgery: psychophysical estimates of cochlear damage in recipients of a short electrode array.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Anthony J Spahr; Sid P Bacon; Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.482

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.