Literature DB >> 22638668

Robot-assisted surgery:--impact on gynaecological and pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

O E O'Sullivan1, B A O'Reilly.   

Abstract

The da Vinci Surgical System dominates robotic surgery, as the only robotic device to have FDA approval in gynaecology. The benefits of robot-assisted surgery include decreased length of stay, decreased blood loss and analgesic requirements. Ergonomic improvements allow the surgeon to operate with less risk of neck and back injury. Unfortunately the initial economic impact of purchasing and maintaining a robot are great but must be balanced with the potential savings from reduced length of stay and earlier return to normal activity. This review looks at the uses for the robot in both gynaecology and urogynaecology, assessing the efficacy of this modality compared to both straight stick (laparoscopy) and open procedures. We assess the benefits to both patient and surgeon from the available literature. Within the current economic environment we appraise the costs associated with the robot.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22638668     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1790-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  87 in total

1.  Evaluation of the introduction of robotic technology on route of hysterectomy and complications in the first year of use.

Authors:  Catherine A Matthews; Natasha Reid; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Kathryn Hull; Stephen Cohen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Randomized trials in robotic surgery: a practical impossibility?

Authors:  Sarah Collins; Paul Tulikangas
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Rate, type, and cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in Germany, France, and England.

Authors:  Dhinagar Subramanian; Karine Szwarcensztein; Josephine A Mauskopf; Mark C Slack
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2009-05-02       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients.

Authors:  Peter C Lim; Elizabeth Kang; Do Hwan Park
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 5.  Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse: abdominal and vaginal approaches.

Authors:  Kristina Cvach; Peter Dwyer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrouteropexy repair of advanced female pelvic organ prolaspe (POP): utilizing POP-quantification-based staging and outcomes.

Authors:  Firouz Daneshgari; John C Kefer; Courtenay Moore; Jihad Kaouk
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Comparison of robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy for treatment of endometrial cancer in obese and morbidly obese patients.

Authors:  N Nevadunsky; R Clark; S Ghosh; M Muto; R Berkowitz; A Vitonis; C Feltmate
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-11-11

8.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  David S Di Marco; George K Chow; Matthew T Gettman; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Comparison of minimally invasive surgical approaches for hysterectomy at a community hospital: robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Bang N Giep; Hoang N Giep; Helen B Hubert
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-08-10

10.  An evaluation of knot integrity when tied robotically and conventionally.

Authors:  Tyler Muffly; T Chad McCormick; Julianne Dean; Aaron Bonham; Richard F C Hill
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-12-27       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Managing novel orally administered anticoagulants in patients undergoing urogynaecological surgery.

Authors:  Claire M McCarthy; Orfhlaith E O'Sullivan; Barry A O'Reilly
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Modifications of transaxillary approach in endoscopic da Vinci-assisted thyroid and parathyroid gland surgery.

Authors:  Basel Al Kadah; Micaela Piccoli; Barbara Mullineris; Giovanni Colli; Martin Janssen; Stephan Siemer; Bernhard Schick
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-09-02

3.  FLS tasks can be used as an ergonomic discriminator between laparoscopic and robotic surgery.

Authors:  Ahmed M Zihni; Ikechukwu Ohu; Jaime A Cavallo; Jenny Ousley; Sohyung Cho; Michael M Awad
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Ergonomic analysis of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Ahmed M Zihni; Ikechukwu Ohu; Jaime A Cavallo; Sohyung Cho; Michael M Awad
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Development of an arm support system to improve ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery: study design and provisional results.

Authors:  Benjamin Steinhilber; Sascha Hoffmann; Kristian Karlovic; Stefan Pfeffer; Thomas Maier; Omar Hallasheh; Stephan Kruck; Robert Seibt; Monika A Rieger; Michael Heidingsfeld; Ronny Feuer; Oliver Sawodny; Ralf Rothmund; Karl-Dietrich Sievert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.584

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.