BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery has revolutionized surgical care by reducing trauma to the patient, thereby decreasing the need for medication and shortening recovery times. During open procedures, surgeons can directly feel tissue characteristics. However, in laparoscopic surgery, tactile feedback during grip is attenuated and limited to the resistance felt in the tool handle. Excessive grip force during laparoscopic surgery can lead to tissue damage. Providing additional supplementary tactile feedback may allow subjects to have better control of grip force and identification of tissue characteristics, potentially decreasing the learning curve associated with complex minimally invasive techniques. METHODS: A tactile feedback system has been developed and integrated into a modified laparoscopic grasper that allows forces applied at the grasper tips to be felt by the surgeon's hands. In this study, 15 subjects (11 novices, 4 experts) were asked to perform single-handed peg transfers using these laparoscopic graspers in three trials (feedback OFF, ON, OFF). Peak and average grip forces (newtons) during each grip event were measured and compared using a Wilcoxon ranked test in which each subject served as his or her own control. RESULTS: After activating the tactile feedback system, the novice subject population showed significant decreases in grip force (p < 0.003). When the system was deactivated for the third trial, there were significant increases in grip force (p < 0.003). Expert subjects showed no significant improvements with the addition of tactile feedback (p > 0.05 in all cases). CONCLUSION: Supplementary tactile feedback helped novice subjects reduce grip force during the laparoscopic training task but did not offer improvements for the four expert subjects. This indicates that tactile feedback may be beneficial for laparoscopic training but has limited long-term use in the nonrobotic setting.
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery has revolutionized surgical care by reducing trauma to the patient, thereby decreasing the need for medication and shortening recovery times. During open procedures, surgeons can directly feel tissue characteristics. However, in laparoscopic surgery, tactile feedback during grip is attenuated and limited to the resistance felt in the tool handle. Excessive grip force during laparoscopic surgery can lead to tissue damage. Providing additional supplementary tactile feedback may allow subjects to have better control of grip force and identification of tissue characteristics, potentially decreasing the learning curve associated with complex minimally invasive techniques. METHODS: A tactile feedback system has been developed and integrated into a modified laparoscopic grasper that allows forces applied at the grasper tips to be felt by the surgeon's hands. In this study, 15 subjects (11 novices, 4 experts) were asked to perform single-handed peg transfers using these laparoscopic graspers in three trials (feedback OFF, ON, OFF). Peak and average grip forces (newtons) during each grip event were measured and compared using a Wilcoxon ranked test in which each subject served as his or her own control. RESULTS: After activating the tactile feedback system, the novice subject population showed significant decreases in grip force (p < 0.003). When the system was deactivated for the third trial, there were significant increases in grip force (p < 0.003). Expert subjects showed no significant improvements with the addition of tactile feedback (p > 0.05 in all cases). CONCLUSION: Supplementary tactile feedback helped novice subjects reduce grip force during the laparoscopic training task but did not offer improvements for the four expert subjects. This indicates that tactile feedback may be beneficial for laparoscopic training but has limited long-term use in the nonrobotic setting.
Authors: Brian T Bethea; Allison M Okamura; Masaya Kitagawa; Torin P Fitton; Stephen M Cattaneo; Vincent L Gott; William A Baumgartner; David D Yuh Journal: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 1.878
Authors: Miguel L Franco; Chih-Hung King; Martin O Culjat; Catherine E Lewis; James W Bisley; E Carmack Holmes; Warren S Grundfest; Erik P Dutson Journal: Int J Med Robot Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 2.547
Authors: Martin O Culjat; Chih-Hung King; Miguel L Franco; Catherine E Lewis; James W Bisley; Erik P Dutson; Warren S Grundfest Journal: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2008
Authors: Christopher Wottawa; Richard Fan; James W Bisley; Erik P Dutson; Martin O Culjat; Warren S Grundfest Journal: Stud Health Technol Inform Date: 2011
Authors: C-H King; M O Culjat; M L Franco; C E Lewis; E P Dutson; W S Grundfest; J W Bisley Journal: IEEE Trans Haptics Date: 2009-03-06 Impact factor: 2.487
Authors: Richard E Fan; Martin O Culjat; Chih-Hung King; Miguel L Franco; Richard Boryk; James W Bisley; Erik Dutson; Warren S Grundfest Journal: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Yingjun Quan; Ao Huang; Min Ye; Ming Xu; Biao Zhuang; Peng Zhang; Bo Yu; Zhijun Min Journal: Gastric Cancer Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 7.370
Authors: Christopher R Wottawa; Bradley Genovese; Bryan N Nowroozi; Steven D Hart; James W Bisley; Warren S Grundfest; Erik P Dutson Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-10-30 Impact factor: 4.584