Literature DB >> 23355154

Perceiving haptic feedback in virtual reality simulators.

Cecilie Våpenstad1, Erlend Fagertun Hofstad, Thomas Langø, Ronald Mårvik, Magdalena Karolina Chmarra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To improve patient safety, training of psychomotor laparoscopic skills is often done on virtual reality (VR) simulators outside the operating room. Haptic sensations have been found to influence psychomotor performance in laparoscopy. The emulation of haptic feedback is thus an important aspect of VR simulation. Some VR simulators try to simulate these sensations with handles equipped with haptic feedback. We conducted a survey on how laparoscopic surgeons perceive handles with and without haptic feedback.
METHODS: Surgeons with different levels of experience in laparoscopy were asked to test two handles: Xitact IHP with haptic feedback and Xitact ITP without haptic feedback (Mentice AB, Gothenburg, Sweden), connected to the LapSim (Surgical Science AB, Sweden) VR simulator. They performed two tasks on the simulator before answering 12 questions regarding the two handles. The surgeons were not informed about the differences in the handles.
RESULTS: A total of 85 % of the 20 surgeons who participated in the survey claimed that it is important that handles with haptic feedback feel realistic. Ninety percent of the surgeons preferred the handles without haptic feedback. The friction in the handles with haptic feedback was perceived to be as in reality (5 %) or too high (95 %). Regarding the handles without haptic feedback, the friction was perceived as in reality (45 %), too low (50 %), or too high (5 %). A total of 85 % of the surgeons thought that the handle with haptic feedback attempts to simulate the resistance offered by tissue to deformation. Ten percent thought that the handle succeeds in doing so.
CONCLUSIONS: The surveyed surgeons believe that haptic feedback is an important feature on VR simulators; however, they preferred the handles without haptic feedback because they perceived the handles with haptic feedback to add additional friction, making them unrealistic and not mechanically transparent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23355154     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2745-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  53 in total

1.  Force feedback plays a significant role in minimally invasive surgery: results and analysis.

Authors:  Gregory Tholey; Jaydev P Desai; Andres E Castellanos
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  What can the operator actually feel when performing a laparoscopy?

Authors:  G Picod; A C Jambon; D Vinatier; P Dubois
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Early exposure to haptic feedback enhances performance in surgical simulator training: a prospective randomized crossover study in surgical residents.

Authors:  P Ström; L Hedman; L Särnå; A Kjellin; T Wredmark; L Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  An evidence-based virtual reality training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  Rajesh Aggarwal; Teodor P Grantcharov; Jens R Eriksen; Dorthe Blirup; Viggo B Kristiansen; Peter Funch-Jensen; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Proficiency-based virtual reality training significantly reduces the error rate for residents during their first 10 laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Authors:  Gunnar Ahlberg; Lars Enochsson; Anthony G Gallagher; Leif Hedman; Christian Hogman; David A McClusky; Stig Ramel; C Daniel Smith; Dag Arvidsson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  The importance of haptic feedback in laparoscopic suturing training and the additive value of virtual reality simulation.

Authors:  Sanne M B I Botden; Fawaz Torab; Sonja N Buzink; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Simulation in surgery: opportunity or threat?

Authors:  A G Gallagher; O Traynor
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic training using the LapMentor II.

Authors:  Mohamad W Salkini; Charles R Doarn; Nicholai Kiehl; Timothy J Broderick; James F Donovan; Krishnanath Gaitonde
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 9.  Procedural virtual reality simulation in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Cecilie Våpenstad; Sonja N Buzink
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Objective evaluation of minimally invasive surgical skills for transplantation. Surgeons using a virtual reality simulator.

Authors:  R Dănilă; B Gerdes; H Ulrike; E Domínguez Fernández; I Hassan
Journal:  Chirurgia (Bucur)       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr
View more
  3 in total

1.  Novel laparoscopic training system with continuously perfused ex-vivo porcine liver for hepatobiliary surgery.

Authors:  Wenyan Liu; Xinglong Zheng; Rongqian Wu; Yinbin Jin; Shu Kong; Jianpeng Li; Jianwen Lu; Huan Yang; Xianghua Xu; Yi Lv; Xiaogang Zhang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Evaluation of a Virtual Reality Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) Surgical Simulator.

Authors:  Ben Sainsbury; Maciej Łącki; Mohammed Shahait; Mitchell Goldenberg; Amir Baghdadi; Lora Cavuoto; Jing Ren; Mark Green; Jason Lee; Timothy D Averch; Carlos Rossa
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2020-01-14

Review 3.  Forensic Implications of Anatomical Education and Surgical Training With Cadavers.

Authors:  Carmelo Pirri; Carla Stecco; Andrea Porzionato; Rafael Boscolo-Berto; René H Fortelny; Veronica Macchi; Marko Konschake; Stefano Merigliano; Raffaele De Caro
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-06-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.