Literature DB >> 22350236

Review of surgical robotics user interface: what is the best way to control robotic surgery?

Anton Simorov1, R Stephen Otte, Courtni M Kopietz, Dmitry Oleynikov.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As surgical robots begin to occupy a larger place in operating rooms around the world, continued innovation is necessary to improve our outcomes.
METHODS: A comprehensive review of current surgical robotic user interfaces was performed to describe the modern surgical platforms, identify the benefits, and address the issues of feedback and limitations of visualization.
RESULTS: Most robots currently used in surgery employ a master/slave relationship, with the surgeon seated at a work-console, manipulating the master system and visualizing the operation on a video screen. Although enormous strides have been made to advance current technology to the point of clinical use, limitations still exist. A lack of haptic feedback to the surgeon and the inability of the surgeon to be stationed at the operating table are the most notable examples. The future of robotic surgery sees a marked increase in the visualization technologies used in the operating room, as well as in the robots' abilities to convey haptic feedback to the surgeon. This will allow unparalleled sensation for the surgeon and almost eliminate inadvertent tissue contact and injury.
CONCLUSIONS: A novel design for a user interface will allow the surgeon to have access to the patient bedside, remaining sterile throughout the procedure, employ a head-mounted three-dimensional visualization system, and allow the most intuitive master manipulation of the slave robot to date.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22350236     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2182-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  25 in total

1.  High-fidelity Haptic synthesis of contact with deformable bodies.

Authors:  Mohsen Mahvash; Vincent Hayward
Journal:  IEEE Comput Graph Appl       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.088

2.  Dexterous miniature robot for advanced minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Amy C Lehman; Nathan A Wood; Shane Farritor; Matthew R Goede; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A virtual-reality-based haptic surgical training system.

Authors:  Holger Weiss; Tobias Ortmaier; Heiko Maass; Gerd Hirzinger; Uwe Kuehnapfel
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2003

4.  Evaluation of unmanned airborne vehicles and mobile robotic telesurgery in an extreme environment.

Authors:  Brett M Harnett; Charles R Doarn; Jacob Rosen; Blake Hannaford; Timothy J Broderick
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.536

5.  Master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot (MASTER) for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).

Authors:  S J Phee; S C Low; V A Huynh; A P Kencana; Z L Sun; K Yang
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

6.  Enhancement of a master-slave robotic system for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Zhenglong Sun; Rui Yee Ang; Ed Wyn Lim; Zheng Wang; Khek Yu Ho; Soo Jay Phee
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.473

7.  Natural orifice transgastric endoscopic wedge hepatic resection in an experimental model using an intuitively controlled master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot (MASTER).

Authors:  S J Phee; K Y Ho; D Lomanto; S C Low; V A Huynh; A P Kencana; K Yang; Z L Sun; S C Sydney Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Stereoscopic visualization and haptic technology used to create a virtual environment for remote surgery - biomed 2011.

Authors:  J M Bornhoft; K W Strabala; T D Wortman; A C Lehman; D Oleynikov; S M Farritor
Journal:  Biomed Sci Instrum       Date:  2011

9.  Real-time myoprocessors for a neural controlled powered exoskeleton arm.

Authors:  Ettore E Cavallaro; Jacob Rosen; Joel C Perry; Stephen Burns
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Robotic prostatectomy: what we have learned and where we are going.

Authors:  David I Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 2.759

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Application of robotics in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A review.

Authors:  Baldwin Po Man Yeung; Philip Wai Yan Chiu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Evaluating tactile feedback in robotic surgery for potential clinical application using an animal model.

Authors:  Christopher R Wottawa; Bradley Genovese; Bryan N Nowroozi; Steven D Hart; James W Bisley; Warren S Grundfest; Erik P Dutson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Impact of Robotic Surgery on Decision Making: Perspectives of Surgical Teams.

Authors:  Rebecca Randell; Natasha Alvarado; Stephanie Honey; Joanne Greenhalgh; Peter Gardner; Arron Gill; David Jayne; Alwyn Kotze; Alan Pearman; Dawn Dowding
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

4.  Evaluation of contactless human-machine interface for robotic surgical training.

Authors:  Fabien Despinoy; Nabil Zemiti; Germain Forestier; Alonso Sánchez; Pierre Jannin; Philippe Poignet
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 5.  Prevalence of haptic feedback in robot-mediated surgery: a systematic review of literature.

Authors:  Farshid Amirabdollahian; Salvatore Livatino; Behrad Vahedi; Radhika Gudipati; Patrick Sheen; Shan Gawrie-Mohan; Nikhil Vasdev
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-12-01

Review 6.  Review of emerging surgical robotic technology.

Authors:  Brian S Peters; Priscila R Armijo; Crystal Krause; Songita A Choudhury; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Surgeons and non-surgeons prefer haptic feedback of instrument vibrations during robotic surgery.

Authors:  Jacqueline K Koehn; Katherine J Kuchenbecker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-25       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Micro-movements of varying difficulties: wrist and arm movements.

Authors:  Jason B Boyle; Charles H Shea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  A simple ERP method for quantitative analysis of cognitive workload in myoelectric prosthesis control and human-machine interaction.

Authors:  Sean Deeny; Caitlin Chicoine; Levi Hargrove; Todd Parrish; Arun Jayaraman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Subxiphoid thymectomy with a double sternum retractor: a pilot study.

Authors:  Beatrice Aramini; Nan Song; Federico Banchelli; Gening Jiang; Diego Gonzalez-Rivas; Jiang Fan
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.