Literature DB >> 17710503

Can surgeons think and operate with haptics at the same time?

Caroline G L Cao1, Mi Zhou, Daniel B Jones, Steven D Schwaitzberg.   

Abstract

Much effort has been devoted to incorporating haptic feedback into surgical simulators. However, the benefits of haptics for novice trainees in the early stages of learning are not clear. Presumably, novices have less spare attentional resources to attend to haptic cues while learning basic laparoscopic skills. The aim of this study was to determine whether novice surgeons have adequate cognitive resources to attend to haptic information. Thirty surgical residents and attendings performed a TransferPlace task in a simulator, with and without haptics. Cognitive loading was imposed using a mental arithmetic task. Subjects performed 10 trials (five with cognitive loading and five without) with and without haptics. Results showed that all subjects performed significantly slower (27%) when they were cognitively loaded than unloaded, but equally accurately in both cases, suggesting a speed-accuracy tradeoff. On average, subjects performed 36% faster and 97% more accurately with haptics than without, even while cognitively loaded. Haptic feedback can not only enhance performance, but also counter the effect of cognitive load. This effect is greater for more experienced surgeons than less experienced ones, indicating greater spare cognitive capacity in surgeons with more experience.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17710503     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0279-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  18 in total

Review 1.  Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective.

Authors:  Lawrence W Way; Lygia Stewart; Walter Gantert; Kingsway Liu; Crystine M Lee; Karen Whang; John G Hunter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Authors:  Neal E Seymour; Anthony G Gallagher; Sanziana A Roman; Michael K O'Brien; Vipin K Bansal; Dana K Andersen; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The influence of force feedback and visual feedback in grasping tissue laparoscopically.

Authors:  E A M Heijnsdijk; A Pasdeloup; A J van der Pijl; J Dankelman; D J Gouma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Force feedback plays a significant role in minimally invasive surgery: results and analysis.

Authors:  Gregory Tholey; Jaydev P Desai; Andres E Castellanos
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  What can the operator actually feel when performing a laparoscopy?

Authors:  G Picod; A C Jambon; D Vinatier; P Dubois
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Analysis of errors enacted by surgical trainees during skills training courses.

Authors:  B Tang; G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Effects of cognitive distraction on performance of laparoscopic surgical tasks.

Authors:  Kristen H Goodell; Caroline G L Cao; Steven D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.878

8.  Study of laparoscopic forces perception for defining simulation fidelity.

Authors:  Pablo Lamata; Enrique J Gómez; Francisco M Sánchez-Margallo; Félix Lamata; María Antolín; Samuel Rodríguez; Alfonso Oltra; Jesús Usón
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2006

9.  Novices in surgery are the target group of a virtual reality training laboratory.

Authors:  Iyad Hassan; Katja Maschuw; Matthias Rothmund; Michael Koller; Berthold Gerdes
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 1.745

10.  Effects of vision and friction on haptic perception.

Authors:  Jesse O Perreault; Caroline G L Cao
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.888

View more
  18 in total

1.  The effect of simulation in improving students' performance in laparoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Azzam S Al-Kadi; Tyrone Donnon; Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci; Philip Mitchell; Estifanos Debru; Neal Church
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Achieving Interface and Environment Fidelity in the Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Surgical Trainer.

Authors:  Amine Chellali; Helena Mentis; Amie Miller; Woojin Ahn; Venkata S Arikatla; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Suvranu De; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Caroline G L Cao
Journal:  Int J Hum Comput Stud       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 3.632

3.  Seasoned surgeons assessed in a laparoscopic surgical crisis.

Authors:  Kinga Powers; Scott T Rehrig; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Mark P Callery; Daniel B Jones
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  In vivo validation of a system for haptic feedback of tool vibrations in robotic surgery.

Authors:  Karlin Bark; William McMahan; Austin Remington; Jamie Gewirtz; Alexei Wedmid; David I Lee; Katherine J Kuchenbecker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Development of force-based metrics for skills assessment in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Ana Luisa Trejos; Rajni V Patel; Richard A Malthaner; Christopher M Schlachta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Effects of a Virtual Pointer on Trainees' Cognitive Load and Communication Efficiency in Surgical Training.

Authors:  Azin Semsar; Hannah McGowan; Yuanyuan Feng; Hamid R Zahiri; Ivan M George; Timothy Turner; Adrian Park; Helena M Mentis; Andrea Kleinsmith
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

7.  Effect of haptic feedback in laparoscopic surgery skill acquisition.

Authors:  M Zhou; S Tse; A Derevianko; D B Jones; S D Schwaitzberg; C G L Cao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Fiber Optic Force Sensors for MRI-Guided Interventions and Rehabilitation: A Review.

Authors:  Hao Su; Iulian I Iordachita; Junichi Tokuda; Nobuhiko Hata; Xuan Liu; Reza Seifabadi; Sheng Xu; Bradford Wood; Gregory S Fischer
Journal:  IEEE Sens J       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.301

Review 9.  Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Allison M Okamura
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.309

10.  Integrating simulation in surgery as a teaching tool and credentialing standard.

Authors:  Scott T Rehrig; Kinga Powers; Daniel B Jones
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.