Literature DB >> 7372917

Detection of temporally uncertain signals.

D M Green, D L Weber.   

Abstract

The effects of signal uncertainty on detection performance were measured using a new procedure that allows precise specification of the initial temporal uncertainty. Five different models of the detection process, two assuming a continous representation of the sensory input and three assuming a discrete representation, were compared with the obtained data. The effects of varying signal uncertainty (the number of potential signal intervals was one, five, or ten) had little effect on detection performance. The one-parameter form of the choice model can be rejected without hesitation. The continuous Gaussian model and the symmetric two-state model are significantly different from the data. The high threshold and sophisticated two-state models provide accurate descriptions of the data that cannot be rejected on statistical grounds.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7372917     DOI: 10.1121/1.384183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  How visual cues for when to listen aid selective auditory attention.

Authors:  Lenny A Varghese; Erol J Ozmeral; Virginia Best; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-02-11

2.  Visually-guided attention enhances target identification in a complex auditory scene.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Erol J Ozmeral; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-14

3.  The effect of signal-temporal uncertainty on detection in bursts of noise or a random-frequency complex.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effect of signal-temporal uncertainty in children and adults: tone detection in noise or a random-frequency masker.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Assessing the effects of temporal coherence on auditory stream formation through comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Simon Krogholt Christiansen; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Yes/no and two-interval forced-choice tasks with listener-based vs observer-based responses.

Authors:  Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Pattern-directed attention in uncertain-frequency detection.

Authors:  J H Howard; A J O'Toole; R Parasuraman; K B Bennett
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-03

8.  Uncertainty about spatial frequency, spatial position, or contrast of visual patterns.

Authors:  E T Davis; P Kramer; N Graham
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-01

9.  Two-state versus continuous-state stimulus representations: a test based on attentional constraints.

Authors:  M L Shaw; R M Mulligan; L D Stone
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-04

10.  Prior knowledge does not facilitate the perceptual organization of dynamic random-dot patterns.

Authors:  J S Lappin; J D Staller
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.