Literature DB >> 21877803

The role of masker fringes for the detection of coherent tone pips.

Virginia M Richards1, Daniel E Shub, Eva Maria Carreira.   

Abstract

Three experiments investigated the role of pre/post exposure to a masker in a detection task with complex, random, spectro-temporal maskers. In the first experiment, the masker was either continuously presented or pulsed on and off with the signal. For most listeners, thresholds were lower when the masker was continuously presented, despite the fact that there was more uncertainty about the timing of the signal. In the second experiment, the signal-bearing portion of the masker was preceded and followed by masker "fringes" of different durations. Consistent with the findings of Experiment 1, for some listeners shorter-duration fringes led to higher thresholds than long-duration fringes. In the third experiment, the masker fringe (a) preceded, (b) followed, or (c) both preceded and followed, the signal. Relative to the middle signal conditions, a late signal yielded lower thresholds and the early signal yielded higher thresholds. These results indicate that listeners can use features of an ongoing sound to extract an added signal and that listeners differ in the importance of pre-exposure for efficient signal extraction. However, listeners do not appear to perform this comparison retrospectively after the signal, potentially indicating a form of backward masking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21877803      PMCID: PMC3190658          DOI: 10.1121/1.3613701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  Cuing effects for informational masking.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Donna L Neff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory frequency focusing is very rapid.

Authors:  Adam Reeves; Bertram Scharf
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Masker-first advantage for cues in informational masking.

Authors:  Virginia M Richards; Rong Huang; Gerald Kidd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Coherence detection: effects of frequency, frequency uncertainty, and onset/offset delays.

Authors:  Rong Huang; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Detectability of auditory signals presented without defined observation intervals.

Authors:  C S Watson; T L Nichols
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Masking produced by spectral uncertainty with multicomponent maskers.

Authors:  D L Neff; D M Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-05

7.  Discriminating coherence in spectro-temporal patterns.

Authors:  G Kidd; C R Mason; H Dai
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Adaptation of suppression as an explanation of enhancement effects.

Authors:  B A Wright; D McFadden; C A Champlin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Binaural masking-level difference as a function of masker and test-signal duration.

Authors:  U T Zwicker; E Zwicker
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Prior stimulation and the masking-level difference.

Authors:  W A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of signal-temporal uncertainty in children and adults: tone detection in noise or a random-frequency masker.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Emily Buss; Kristina Bowdrie
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.