Literature DB >> 19045515

Validation of finite element predictions of cartilage contact pressure in the human hip joint.

Andrew E Anderson1, Benjamin J Ellis, Steve A Maas, Christopher L Peters, Jeffrey A Weiss.   

Abstract

Methods to predict contact stresses in the hip can provide an improved understanding of load distribution in the normal and pathologic joint. The objectives of this study were to develop and validate a three-dimensional finite element (FE) model for predicting cartilage contact stresses in the human hip using subject-specific geometry from computed tomography image data, and to assess the sensitivity of model predictions to boundary conditions, cartilage geometry, and cartilage material properties. Loads based on in vivo data were applied to a cadaveric hip joint to simulate walking, descending stairs, and stair-climbing. Contact pressures and areas were measured using pressure sensitive film. CT image data were segmented and discretized into FE meshes of bone and cartilage. FE boundary and loading conditions mimicked the experimental testing. Fair to good qualitative correspondence was obtained between FE predictions and experimental measurements for simulated walking and descending stairs, while excellent agreement was obtained for stair-climbing. Experimental peak pressures, average pressures, and contact areas were 10.0 MPa (limit of film detection), 4.4-5.0 MPa, and 321.9-425.1 mm(2), respectively, while FE-predicted peak pressures, average pressures, and contact areas were 10.8-12.7 MPa, 5.1-6.2 MPa, and 304.2-366.1 mm(2), respectively. Misalignment errors, determined as the difference in root mean squared error before and after alignment of FE results, were less than 10%. Magnitude errors, determined as the residual error following alignment, were approximately 30% but decreased to 10-15% when the regions of highest pressure were compared. Alterations to the cartilage shear modulus, bulk modulus, or thickness resulted in +/-25% change in peak pressures, while changes in average pressures and contact areas were minor (+/-10%). When the pelvis and proximal femur were represented as rigid, there were large changes, but the effect depended on the particular loading scenario. Overall, the subject-specific FE predictions compared favorably with pressure film measurements and were in good agreement with published experimental data. The validated modeling framework provides a foundation for development of patient-specific FE models to investigate the mechanics of normal and pathological hips.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19045515      PMCID: PMC2840996          DOI: 10.1115/1.2953472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  49 in total

1.  A method for measuring joint kinematics designed for accurate registration of kinematic data to models constructed from CT data.

Authors:  K J Fischer; T T Manson; H J Pfaeffle; M M Tomaino; S L Woo
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  A finite element model of the shoulder: application to the comparison of normal and osteoarthritic joints.

Authors:  P Büchler; N A Ramaniraka; L R Rakotomanana; J P Iannotti; A Farron
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Equivalence between short-time biphasic and incompressible elastic material responses.

Authors:  Gerard A Ateshian; Benjamin J Ellis; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities.

Authors:  G Bergmann; G Deuretzbacher; M Heller; F Graichen; A Rohlmann; J Strauss; G N Duda
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Normal hip joint contact pressure distribution in single-leg standing--effect of gender and anatomic parameters.

Authors:  E Genda; N Iwasaki; G Li; B A MacWilliams; P J Barrance; E Y Chao
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Depth-dependent compressive properties of normal aged human femoral head articular cartilage: relationship to fixed charge density.

Authors:  S S Chen; Y H Falcovitz; R Schneiderman; A Maroudas; R L Sah
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  An in vitro investigation of the acetabular labral seal in hip joint mechanics.

Authors:  S J Ferguson; J T Bryant; R Ganz; K Ito
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Mechanical response of bovine articular cartilage under dynamic unconfined compression loading at physiological stress levels.

Authors:  S Park; C T Hung; G A Ateshian
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 9.  Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 1: the disease and its risk factors.

Authors:  D T Felson; R C Lawrence; P A Dieppe; R Hirsch; C G Helmick; J M Jordan; R S Kington; N E Lane; M C Nevitt; Y Zhang; M Sowers; T McAlindon; T D Spector; A R Poole; S Z Yanovski; G Ateshian; L Sharma; J A Buckwalter; K D Brandt; J F Fries
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2000-10-17       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Analysis and evaluation of the biofidelity of the human body finite element model in lateral impact simulations according to ISO-TR9790 procedures.

Authors:  Jesse S Ruan; Raed El-Jawahri; Stephen W Rouhana; Saeed Barbat; Priya Prasad
Journal:  Stapp Car Crash J       Date:  2006-11
View more
  69 in total

1.  FEATURE-BASED MULTIBLOCK FINITE ELEMENT MESH GENERATION.

Authors:  Kiran H Shivanna; Srinivas C Tadepalli; Nicole M Grosland
Journal:  Comput Aided Des       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.027

Review 2.  Multiscale mechanics of articular cartilage: potentials and challenges of coupling musculoskeletal, joint, and microscale computational models.

Authors:  J P Halloran; S Sibole; C C van Donkelaar; M C van Turnhout; C W J Oomens; J A Weiss; F Guilak; A Erdemir
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Effects of idealized joint geometry on finite element predictions of cartilage contact stresses in the hip.

Authors:  Andrew E Anderson; Benjamin J Ellis; Steve A Maas; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Role of the acetabular labrum in load support across the hip joint.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Benjamin J Ellis; Michael D Harris; Andrew E Anderson; Christopher L Peters; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Nonlinear elasticity of biological tissues with statistical fibre orientation.

Authors:  Salvatore Federico; T Christian Gasser
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 6.  Current progress in patient-specific modeling.

Authors:  Maxwell Lewis Neal; Roy Kerckhoffs
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 11.622

7.  Hip-preserving surgery: understanding complex pathomorphology.

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Jill A Erickson; Lucas Anderson; Andrew A Anderson; Jeff Weiss
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Early experience with a comprehensive hip preservation service intended to improve clinical care, education, and academic productivity.

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Stephen K Aoki; Jill A Erickson; Lucas A Anderson; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A new discrete element analysis method for predicting hip joint contact stresses.

Authors:  Christine L Abraham; Steve A Maas; Jeffrey A Weiss; Benjamin J Ellis; Christopher L Peters; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Finite element prediction of transchondral stress and strain in the human hip.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Gerard A Ateshian; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.