Literature DB >> 23453394

A new discrete element analysis method for predicting hip joint contact stresses.

Christine L Abraham1, Steve A Maas, Jeffrey A Weiss, Benjamin J Ellis, Christopher L Peters, Andrew E Anderson.   

Abstract

Quantifying cartilage contact stress is paramount to understanding hip osteoarthritis. Discrete element analysis (DEA) is a computationally efficient method to estimate cartilage contact stresses. Previous applications of DEA have underestimated cartilage stresses and yielded unrealistic contact patterns because they assumed constant cartilage thickness and/or concentric joint geometry. The study objectives were to: (1) develop a DEA model of the hip joint with subject-specific bone and cartilage geometry, (2) validate the DEA model by comparing DEA predictions to those of a validated finite element analysis (FEA) model, and (3) verify both the DEA and FEA models with a linear-elastic boundary value problem. Springs representing cartilage in the DEA model were given lengths equivalent to the sum of acetabular and femoral cartilage thickness and gap distance in the FEA model. Material properties and boundary/loading conditions were equivalent. Walking, descending, and ascending stairs were simulated. Solution times for DEA and FEA models were ~7 s and ~65 min, respectively. Irregular, complex contact patterns predicted by DEA were in excellent agreement with FEA. DEA contact areas were 7.5%, 9.7% and 3.7% less than FEA for walking, descending stairs, and ascending stairs, respectively. DEA models predicted higher peak contact stresses (9.8-13.6 MPa) and average contact stresses (3.0-3.7 MPa) than FEA (6.2-9.8 and 2.0-2.5 MPa, respectively). DEA overestimated stresses due to the absence of the Poisson's effect and a direct contact interface between cartilage layers. Nevertheless, DEA predicted realistic contact patterns when subject-specific bone geometry and cartilage thickness were used. This DEA method may have application as an alternative to FEA for pre-operative planning of joint-preserving surgery such as acetabular reorientation during peri-acetabular osteotomy.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23453394      PMCID: PMC3623562          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  33 in total

1.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities.

Authors:  G Bergmann; G Deuretzbacher; M Heller; F Graichen; A Rohlmann; J Strauss; G N Duda
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Contact pressures in the human hip joint.

Authors:  N Y Afoke; P D Byers; W C Hutton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1987-08

3.  In vitro contact stress distributions in the natural human hip.

Authors:  T D Brown; D T Shaw
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  The effect of conformity and plastic thickness on contact stresses in metal-backed plastic implants.

Authors:  D L Bartel; A H Burstein; M D Toda; D L Edwards
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  A contact-coupled finite element analysis of the natural adult hip.

Authors:  T D Brown; A M DiGioia
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Contributions of non-spherical hip joint cartilage surface to hip joint contact stress.

Authors:  Dong-Yun Gu; Fei Hu; Jian-Hei Wei; Ke-Rong Dai; Ya-Zhu Chen
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2011

7.  Cartilage stresses in the human hip joint.

Authors:  T Macirowski; S Tepic; R W Mann
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.097

8.  Etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Comparative study of the intrinsic mechanical properties of the human acetabular and femoral head cartilage.

Authors:  K A Athanasiou; A Agarwal; F J Dzida
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Chronic stress tolerance levels for human articular cartilage: two nonuniform contact models applied to long-term follow-up of CDH.

Authors:  T A Maxian; T D Brown; S L Weinstein
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  11 in total

1.  Patient Age and Hip Morphology Alter Joint Mechanics in Computational Models of Patients With Hip Dysplasia.

Authors:  Holly D Thomas-Aitken; Jessica E Goetz; Kevin N Dibbern; Robert W Westermann; Michael C Willey; Timothy S Brown
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Efficient Computation of Cartilage Contact Pressures within Dynamic Simulations of Movement.

Authors:  Colin R Smith; Kwang Won Choi; Dan Negrut; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis       Date:  2016-05-13

3.  Expedited patient-specific assessment of contact stress exposure in the ankle joint following definitive articular fracture reduction.

Authors:  Andrew M Kern; Donald D Anderson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Development and validation of a kinematically-driven discrete element model of the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  Jonathan A Gustafson; John J Elias; Richard E Debski; Shawn Farrokhi
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  CORR Insights®: Is Anterior Rotation of the Acetabulum Necessary to Normalize Joint Contact Pressure in Periacetabular Osteotomy? A Finite-element Analysis Study.

Authors:  Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Finite element prediction of transchondral stress and strain in the human hip.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Gerard A Ateshian; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Specimen-specific predictions of contact stress under physiological loading in the human hip: validation and sensitivity studies.

Authors:  Corinne R Henak; Ashley L Kapron; Andrew E Anderson; Benjamin J Ellis; Steve A Maas; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2013-06-05

8.  Joint contact stresses calculated for acetabular dysplasia patients using discrete element analysis are significantly influenced by the applied gait pattern.

Authors:  Holly D Thomas-Aitken; Michael C Willey; Jessica E Goetz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Management of Osteoarthritis with Avocado/Soybean Unsaponifiables.

Authors:  Blaine A Christiansen; Simi Bhatti; Ramin Goudarzi; Shahin Emami
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Biomechanical factors in planning of periacetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  Noushin Niknafs; Ryan J Murphy; Robert S Armiger; Jyri Lepistö; Mehran Armand
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2013-12-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.