Literature DB >> 19884411

Hip-preserving surgery: understanding complex pathomorphology.

Christopher L Peters1, Jill A Erickson, Lucas Anderson, Andrew A Anderson, Jeff Weiss.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19884411      PMCID： PMC3347478          DOI： 10.2106/JBJS.I.00612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN： 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


× No keyword cloud information.
  50 in total

1.  Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs.

Authors:  M Tannast; G Zheng; C Anderegg; K Burckhardt; F Langlotz; R Ganz; K A Siebenrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  [Differential diagnosis of hip and groin pain. Symptoms and technique for physical examination].

Authors:  P Holmich; M Dienst
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity.

Authors:  Dominik C Meyer; Martin Beck; Tom Ellis; Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  [Femoroacetabular impingement: trigger for the development of coxarthrosis].

Authors:  M Leunig; M Beck; C Dora; R Ganz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Subject-specific finite element model of the pelvis: development, validation and sensitivity studies.

Authors:  Andrew E Anderson; Christopher L Peters; Benjamin D Tuttle; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement with surgical dislocation and débridement in young adults.

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Jill A Erickson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: characteristic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients.

Authors:  Christian W A Pfirrmann; Bernard Mengiardi; Claudio Dora; Fabian Kalberer; Marco Zanetti; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Triad of MR arthrographic findings in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Ara Kassarjian; Luke S Yoon; Etienne Belzile; Susan A Connolly; Michael B Millis; William E Palmer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Fibrocystic changes at anterosuperior femoral neck: prevalence in hips with femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Michael Leunig; Martin Beck; Morteza Kalhor; Young-Jo Kim; Stefan Werlen; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Relationship between offset angle alpha and hip chondral injury in femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Todd L Johnston; Mara L Schenker; Karen K Briggs; Marc J Philippon
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 4.772
View more
  16 in total

1.  A review of imaging modalities for the hip.

Authors:  Alexander E Weber; Jon A Jacobson; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-09

2.  Reports of magnetic resonance images of the hip in patients with femoroacetabular impingement: is useful information provided to the orthopedic surgeon?

Authors:  Claudio Diaz-Ledezma; Marcelo Casaccia; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Early experience with a comprehensive hip preservation service intended to improve clinical care, education, and academic productivity.

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Stephen K Aoki; Jill A Erickson; Lucas A Anderson; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Novel 3-D quantification and classification of cam lesions in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (DOI 10.1007/s11999-012-2693-9).

Authors:  Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Accuracy of 3D dual echo steady state (DESS) MR arthrography to quantify acetabular cartilage thickness.

Authors:  Christine L Abraham; Neal K Bangerter; Lance S McGavin; Christopher L Peters; Alex J Drew; Christopher J Hanrahan; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Can femoroacetabular impingement and hip dysplasia be distinguished by clinical presentation and patient history?

Authors:  Thomas Kappe; Tugrul Kocak; Heiko Reichel; Christian R Fraitzl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Statistical shape modeling of cam femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Michael D Harris; Manasi Datar; Ross T Whitaker; Elizabeth R Jurrus; Christopher L Peters; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Statistical shape modeling of femur shape variability in female patients with hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Brecca M M Gaffney; Travis J Hillen; Jeffrey J Nepple; John C Clohisy; Michael D Harris
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Application of three-dimensional computerised tomography reconstruction and image processing technology in individual operation design of developmental dysplasia of the hip patients.

Authors:  Wang Xuyi; Peng Jianping; Zhu Junfeng; Shen Chao; Cui Yimin; Chen Xiaodong
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Emerging ideas: Novel 3-D quantification and classification of cam lesions in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Richard W Kang; Adam B Yanke; Alejandro A Espinoza Orias; Alejandro Espinoza Orias; Nozomu Inoue; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 4.176
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.