Literature DB >> 19034445

Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at midterm follow-up?

Yogeesh D Kamat1, Kamran M Aurakzai, Ajeya R Adhikari, Daniel Matthews, Yegappan Kalairajah, Richard E Field.   

Abstract

Computer navigation assistance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) results in consistently accurate alignment of prostheses. We aimed to compare the outcome of computer-navigated and conventional TKA and to analyse the radiologically malaligned knees. We analysed 637 primary TKA, carried out by a single surgeon, over five consecutive years and divided them into two cohorts: group 1 = STA (standard instrumentation) and group 2 = CAS (computer-assisted surgery). There was no significant difference between the average Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) of the two groups at any time from one to five years. However, the malaligned TKA at three years had a worse OKS. At medium term there is no difference in clinical outcome measures that can be attributed to the surgeon having used computer-assisted navigation for TKA. But group 1, having a higher proportion of malaligned TKA, might show worsening of OKS at long term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19034445      PMCID: PMC2899163          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-008-0690-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  19 in total

1.  Appropriate questionnaires for knee arthroplasty. Results of a survey of 3600 patients from The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Registry.

Authors:  M J Dunbar; O Robertsson; L Ryd; L Lidgren
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-04

Review 2.  Rating systems for total knee replacement.

Authors:  Andrew P Davies
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  How accurate is current TKR instrumentation?

Authors:  S David Stulberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique.

Authors:  H Bäthis; L Perlick; M Tingart; C Lüring; D Zurakowski; J Grifka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-07

5.  Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol).

Authors:  S K Chauhan; G W Clark; S Lloyd; R G Scott; W Breidahl; J M Sikorski
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-08

6.  Clinical values in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Nobuhiro Tsumura; Masahiro Kurosaka; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Shinichi Yoshiya; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.390

7.  Navigation in total knee arthroplasty. A multicenter study.

Authors:  F Maculé-Beneyto; D Hernández-Vaquero; J M Segur-Vilalta; R Colomina-Rodríguez; P Hinarejos-Gomez; I García-Forcada; B Seral Garcia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-05-31       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Experiences with computer navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Zoltán Bejek; László Sólyom; Miklós Szendrõi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-11-04       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A Rand; M B Coventry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Functional rating for knee arthroplasty: comparison of three scoring systems.

Authors:  Raymond Y L Liow; Karen Walker; Mohammad A Wajid; Gurinder Bedi; Catherine M E Lennox
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  47 in total

1.  The limits of precision in conventionally instrumented computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R E da Assunção; N J Hancock; W J M Bruce; P Walker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Functional outcome after computer-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Jörg Lützner; Klaus-Peter Günther; Stephan Kirschner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies.

Authors:  Yaron S Brin; Vassilios S Nikolaou; Lawrence Joseph; David J Zukor; John Antoniou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation, computer-assisted surgery, and manual instrumentation: a short-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Mark Yaffe; Michael Luo; Nitin Goyal; Philip Chan; Anay Patel; Max Cayo; S David Stulberg
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 5.  Clinical outcome and quality of life after computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: results from a prospective, single-surgeon study and review of the literature.

Authors:  Christian-Dominik Peterlein; Markus Dietmar Schofer; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Friedrich Georg Scherf
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2009-10-30

6.  Small improvements in mechanical axis alignment achieved with MRI versus CT-based patient-specific instruments in TKA: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Tilman Pfitzner; Matthew P Abdel; Philipp von Roth; Carsten Perka; Hagen Hommel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  A five to seven year follow-up comparing computer-assisted vs freehand TKR with regard to clinical parameters.

Authors:  C Lüring; M Kauper; H Bäthis; L Perlick; J Beckmann; J Grifka; M Tingart; B Rath
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  The effect of pelvic movement on the accuracy of hip centre location acquired using an imageless navigation system.

Authors:  Sebastien Lustig; Cyrille Fleury; Elvire Servien; Guillaume Demey; Philippe Neyret; Simon T Donell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Mid-term outcomes of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazunari Ishida; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Nobuhiro Tsumura; Seiji Kubo; Atsushi Kitagawa; Takaaki Chin; Tetsuhiro Iguchi; Masahiro Kurosaka; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review.

Authors:  R Stephen J Burnett; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.