Literature DB >> 17115156

Experiences with computer navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Zoltán Bejek1, László Sólyom, Miklós Szendrõi.   

Abstract

The successful outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is very much dependent on precise positioning of the components. Inaccuracy may result in complaints as well as in early mechanical failure. Between March 2003 and September 2005, 69 TKA procedures were performed by the computer navigated technique. The postoperative outcome of this cohort was compared with the same number of TKAs done by the traditional technique. The lower limb anatomical axis was determined in all cases pre- and postoperatively by weight-bearing anteroposterior (AP) and lateral full length X-rays. The positions of femoral and tibial components were recorded. Comparing the data in the navigation group on the AP view, 96.6% of femoral and 96.9% of tibial components and on the lateral view in 95.4% of femoral and in 95.4% of tibial components, the overall postoperative axis in 95.4% fell in the range considered in the literature as optimal. In the traditional group on the AP view, 75.7% of femoral and 68.1% of tibial components and on the lateral view 81.8% of femoral and 63.6% of tibial components, the overall postoperative axis in 60.6% fell between the values considered optimal in the literature. It seems to be proven that the computer navigated total knee arthroplasty technique ensures positioning of components significantly more precisely compared with the traditional surgical method. Accuracy of navigation depends on the software used, on the correct detection of anatomical reference points, and on a potentially uneven thickness of the cement layer during final insertion of the components. The computer navigated technique does not substitute professional skill and experience, since it merely transmits information for the surgeon. The decision is in the hands of the doctor during the entire procedure. The real benefits of the computer navigated technique require further research and can be determined only after long-term analyses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17115156      PMCID: PMC2266654          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0254-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  15 in total

Review 1.  The difficult knee: severe varus and valgus.

Authors:  Gerard A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  How accurate is current TKR instrumentation?

Authors:  S David Stulberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Cyril Boeri
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  M Sparmann; B Wolke; H Czupalla; D Banzer; A Zink
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-08

Review 5.  Computer assisted surgery for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Nizard
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 0.500

6.  Computed tomography-based navigation for hip, knee, and spine surgery.

Authors:  Louis-Philippe Amiot; François Poulin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial.

Authors:  S K Chauhan; R G Scott; W Breidahl; R J Beaver
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-04

8.  Image-guided surgery for total knee replacement.

Authors:  M L Porter; A K Gambhir; N Pradhan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Image-based computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to lower variability in coronal alignment.

Authors:  Jan Victor; Davy Hoste
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Minimal incision total knee arthroplasty: early experience.

Authors:  Alfred J Tria; Thomas M Coon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  14 in total

1.  Gait analysis following TKA: comparison of conventional technique, computer-assisted navigation and minimally invasive technique combined with computer-assisted navigation.

Authors:  Zoltán Bejek; Róbert Paróczai; Miklós Szendröi; Rita M Kiss
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies.

Authors:  Yaron S Brin; Vassilios S Nikolaou; Lawrence Joseph; David J Zukor; John Antoniou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  The accuracy of extramedullary guides for tibial component placement in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  K Y Chiu; W P Yau; T P Ng; W M Tang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Reliability of leg alignment using the OrthoPilot system depends on knee position: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Oliver Hauschild; L Konstantinidis; P C Strohm; P Niemeyer; N P Suedkamp; P Helwig
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at midterm follow-up?

Authors:  Yogeesh D Kamat; Kamran M Aurakzai; Ajeya R Adhikari; Daniel Matthews; Yegappan Kalairajah; Richard E Field
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Navigation did not improve the precision of minimally invasive knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter M Bonutti; Daniel A Dethmers; Mike S McGrath; Slif D Ulrich; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Navigation knee replacement.

Authors:  Rupen Dattani; Surendra Patnaik; Avadhoot Kantak; Georgis Tselentakis
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Comparative study of the use of computer assisted navigation system for axial correction in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mui-Hong Lim; Andras Tallay; John Bartlett
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  Does computer-assisted surgery improve postoperative leg alignment and implant positioning following total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials?

Authors:  Tao Cheng; Song Zhao; Xiaochun Peng; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Computer assisted versus conventional cemented total knee prostheses alignment accuracy and micromotion of the tibial component.

Authors:  Thisbe van Strien; Enrike van der Linden-van der Zwaag; Bart Kaptein; Arjan van Erkel; Edward Valstar; Rob Nelissen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.