Literature DB >> 16736149

Navigation in total knee arthroplasty. A multicenter study.

F Maculé-Beneyto1, D Hernández-Vaquero, J M Segur-Vilalta, R Colomina-Rodríguez, P Hinarejos-Gomez, I García-Forcada, B Seral Garcia.   

Abstract

We carried out a multicentre study to compare the postoperative femorotibial radiographic axis in two total knee replacement groups; one using manual instrumentation and the other using navigation. In the latter group, three navigation systems were used: Stryker, Orthopilot and Navitrack. The prior circumstances of patients in terms of age, weight, aetiology, epicondylar perimeter, patellar tendon length and knee deformity was similar in both groups. The duration of the operation was longer in the group with navigation (16.7 min). A normal femorotibial axis was more frequently obtained in the group with a navigator compared to the manual group (48.1% and 30%, respectively). A varus axis was most common in the manual group (42.2 and 26.9%, respectively). When we analysed the final postoperative radiographic axis, taking 180 degrees to be a normal result, we noted that cases where manual instrumentation was used deviated by 1.19 degrees more than those carried out with navigation, with this difference being statistically significant (P<0.001). No significant differences were found in the final angle of the extremity with the different navigation systems. The navigation systems used in this study improve the frontal angle of the arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16736149      PMCID: PMC3172750          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0126-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  24 in total

1.  The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 Press Fit Condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  J Mahaluxmivala; M J Bankes; P Nicolai; C H Aldam; P W Allen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  [Computer-assisted implantation of a total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study in comparison with classical instrumentation].

Authors:  J Y Jenny; C Boeri
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2001-11

3.  Instrumentation pitfalls: you just can't go on autopilot!

Authors:  Richard S Laskin
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 4.  Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery: do we need CAOS?

Authors:  J M Sikorski; S Chauhan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-04

5.  Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study.

Authors:  M Sparmann; B Wolke; H Czupalla; D Banzer; A Zink
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-08

6.  Bone cutting errors in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher Plaskos; Antony J Hodgson; Kevin Inkpen; Robert W McGraw
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Jenny; Cyril Boeri
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-02

8.  Total knee arthroplasty implanted with and without kinematic navigation.

Authors:  R Hart; M Janecek; A Chaker; P Bucek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  [Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: comparison with a conventional procedure. Results of 50 cases in a prospective randomized study].

Authors:  D Saragaglia; F Picard; C Chaussard; E Montbarbon; F Leitner; P Cinquin
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  2001-02-01

10.  Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation.

Authors:  Ralf Decking; Yma Markmann; Johannes Fuchs; Wolfhart Puhl; Hanns-Peter Scharf
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Alignment outcomes in navigated total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yonghui Fu; Mingming Wang; Yifeng Liu; Qin Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  No difference in ROM and knee function between mobile and floating platforms in TKA.

Authors:  Johannes Holinka; Navid Bahrami; Richard Lass; Sophie Frantal; Reinhard Windhager; Hugo Axel Wanivenhaus
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Imageless computer assisted versus conventional total knee replacement. A Bayesian meta-analysis of 23 comparative studies.

Authors:  Yaron S Brin; Vassilios S Nikolaou; Lawrence Joseph; David J Zukor; John Antoniou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Novel computer-assisted method for revision arthroplasty of the knee.

Authors:  Hanns-Edgar Hoffart; Harald Dinges; Stefan Kolbeck; Peter Ritschl; Hagen Hommel
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-18

5.  The accuracy of extramedullary guides for tibial component placement in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  K Y Chiu; W P Yau; T P Ng; W M Tang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Knee osteotomy: navigation guided and arthroscopy assisted.

Authors:  S Sastre; P Torner; F Maculé
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Computer-assisted surgery can reduce blood loss after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pedro Hinarejos; Mónica Corrales; Antonia Matamalas; Elvira Bisbe; Enric Cáceres
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Does computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improve patient outcome at midterm follow-up?

Authors:  Yogeesh D Kamat; Kamran M Aurakzai; Ajeya R Adhikari; Daniel Matthews; Yegappan Kalairajah; Richard E Field
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Navigation did not improve the precision of minimally invasive knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter M Bonutti; Daniel A Dethmers; Mike S McGrath; Slif D Ulrich; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Computer-assisted revision of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Aymard de Ladoucette
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.