Literature DB >> 19000216

Perceptual-load-induced selection as a result of local competitive interactions in visual cortex.

Ana Torralbo1, Diane M Beck.   

Abstract

A growing literature suggests that the degree to which distracting information can be ignored depends on the perceptual load of the task, or the extent to which the task exhausts perceptual capacity. However, there is currently no a priori definition of what constitutes high or low perceptual load. We propose that interactions among cells in visual cortex that represent nearby stimuli determine the perceptual load of a task, and that manipulations designed to modulate these competitive spatial interactions should modulate distractor processing. We found that either spatially separating the task-relevant items in a display or placing the target and nontargets in different visual fields increased interference from a distractor that was to be ignored. These data are consistent with the idea that the ability to ignore such distracting information results in part from the need to actively resolve competitive interactions in visual cortex, and is not the consequence of an exhausted capacity per se.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19000216      PMCID: PMC2585548          DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02197.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  26 in total

1.  The spatial resolution of visual attention.

Authors:  J Intriligator; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Perceptual load and visuocortical processing: event-related potentials reveal sensory-level selection.

Authors:  T C Handy; M Soltani; G R Mangun
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-05

3.  Interacting roles of attention and visual salience in V4.

Authors:  John H Reynolds; Robert Desimone
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Dynamics of feature binding during object-selective attention.

Authors:  M A Schoenfeld; C Tempelmann; A Martinez; J-M Hopf; C Sattler; H-J Heinze; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Time course and time-distance relationships for surround suppression in macaque V1 neurons.

Authors:  Wyeth Bair; James R Cavanaugh; J Anthony Movshon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Eccentric vision: adverse interactions between line segments.

Authors:  J J Andriessen; H Bouma
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Double take: parallel processing by the cerebral hemispheres reduces attentional blink.

Authors:  Paige E Scalf; Marie T Banich; Arthur F Kramer; Kunjan Narechania; Clarissa D Simon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Receptive field size-dependent attention effects in simultaneously presented stimulus displays.

Authors:  Mart Bles; Jens Schwarzbach; Peter De Weerd; Rainer Goebel; Bernadette M Jansma
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex.

Authors:  C Blakemore; E A Tobin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the Macaque.

Authors:  C G Gross; C E Rocha-Miranda; D B Bender
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  28 in total

1.  Anatomical constraints on attention: hemifield independence is a signature of multifocal spatial selection.

Authors:  George A Alvarez; Jonathan Gill; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Attentional capture under high perceptual load.

Authors:  Joshua D Cosman; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-12

Review 3.  Twenty years of load theory-Where are we now, and where should we go next?

Authors:  Gillian Murphy; John A Groeger; Ciara M Greene
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

4.  Integration of Partial Information Within and Across Modalities: Contributions to Spoken and Written Sentence Recognition.

Authors:  Kimberly G Smith; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Attentional selection within and across hemispheres: implications for the perceptual load theory.

Authors:  Ping Wei; Guanlan Kang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  High perceptual load leads to both reduced gain and broader orientation tuning.

Authors:  Moritz Stolte; Bahador Bahrami; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Context-dependent control over attentional capture.

Authors:  Joshua D Cosman; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Can automaticity be verified utilizing a perceptual load manipulation?

Authors:  Hanna Benoni
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

Review 9.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  The role of perceptual load in object recognition.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Zhicheng Lin; Nahid Zokaei; Volker Thoma
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.