Literature DB >> 23187885

Attentional selection within and across hemispheres: implications for the perceptual load theory.

Ping Wei1, Guanlan Kang, Xiaolin Zhou.   

Abstract

The perceptual load of a given task affects attentional selection, with the selection occurring earlier when the load is high and later when the load is low. Recent evidence suggests that local competitive interaction may underlie the perceptual load effect and determine to what extent a task-irrelevant distractor is processed. Here, we asked participants to search for a target bar among homogeneously oriented bars (the low load conditions) or heterogeneously oriented bars (the high load conditions) in the central display, while ignoring a congruent or incongruent flanker bar presented to the left or right side of the central display, or a bar presented at one of the six positions outer to the central display. Importantly, we differentiated conditions in which the target in the central display and the peripheral flanker was presented within the same hemifield or across different hemifields. Results showed a significant flanker effect for the low load condition, but not for the high load condition, when the target and the flanker were across hemifields. However, when the target and the flanker were presented within the same hemifield, there was no flanker effect for either low or high load conditions. These findings demonstrate that the ability to ignore the task-irrelevant distractor is affected by local competition within hemisphere and that the perceptual load theory needs to be supplemented with detailed analysis of cognitive processes and mechanisms underlying the consumption of attentional resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23187885     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3346-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Attentional capture by abrupt onsets and feature singletons produces inhibitory surrounds.

Authors:  J R Mounts
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-10

2.  Attentional interference at small spatial separations.

Authors:  D O Bahcall; E Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4.

Authors:  J H Reynolds; L Chelazzi; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The neural basis of the bilateral distribution advantage.

Authors:  Stefan Pollmann; Eran Zaidel; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The role of salience in localized attentional interference.

Authors:  Jeffrey R W Mounts; Brandon E Gavett
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  A high-loaded hemisphere successfully ignores distractors.

Authors:  Ritsuko Nishimura; Kazuhito Yoshizaki
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2010-07-01

Review 7.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Hemisphere division and its effect on selective attention: a generality examination of Lavie's load theory.

Authors:  Ritsuko Nishimura; Kazuhito Yoshizaki; Kimiko Kato; Takeshi Hatta
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.292

Review 9.  Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention.

Authors:  G R Mangun
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Dilution: atheoretical burden or just load? A reply to Tsal and Benoni (2010).

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Ana Torralbo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  4 in total

1.  Reward breaks through center-surround inhibition via anterior insula.

Authors:  Lihui Wang; Hongbo Yu; Jie Hu; Jan Theeuwes; Xiaoliang Gong; Yang Xiang; Changjun Jiang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Twenty years of load theory-Where are we now, and where should we go next?

Authors:  Gillian Murphy; John A Groeger; Ciara M Greene
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

3.  The cognitive loci of the display and task-relevant set size effects on distractor interference: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm.

Authors:  Bo Youn Park; Sujin Kim; Yang Seok Cho
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Attention induced neural response trade-off in retinotopic cortex under load.

Authors:  Ana Torralbo; Todd A Kelley; Geraint Rees; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.