Literature DB >> 24610952

High perceptual load leads to both reduced gain and broader orientation tuning.

Moritz Stolte1, Bahador Bahrami, Nilli Lavie.   

Abstract

Due to its limited capacity, visual perception depends on the allocation of attention. The resultant phenomena of inattentional blindness, accompanied by reduced sensory visual cortex response to unattended stimuli in conditions of high perceptual load in the attended task, are now well established (Lavie, 2005; Lavie, 2010, for reviews). However, the underlying mechanisms for these effects remain to be elucidated. Specifically, is reduced perceptual processing under high perceptual load a result of reduced sensory signal gain, broader tuning, or both? We examined this question with psychophysical measures of orientation tuning under different levels of perceptual load in the task performed. Our results show that increased perceptual load leads to both reduced sensory signal and broadening of tuning. These results clarify the effects of attention on elementary visual perception and suggest that high perceptual load is critical for attentional effects on sensory tuning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; gain; orientation; perceptual load; tuning

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24610952      PMCID: PMC3948377          DOI: 10.1167/14.3.9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  41 in total

Review 1.  Neural mechanisms of orientation selectivity in the visual cortex.

Authors:  D Ferster; K D Miller
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Mechanisms of perceptual attention in precuing of location.

Authors:  B A Dosher; Z L Lu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  A linear cue combination framework for understanding selective attention.

Authors:  Richard F Murray; Allison B Sekuler; Patrick J Bennett
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The footprints of visual attention in the Posner cueing paradigm revealed by classification images.

Authors:  Miguel P Eckstein; Steven S Shimozaki; Craig K Abbey
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Daniel H O'Connor; Miki M Fukui; Mark A Pinsk; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Feature-based attention increases the selectivity of population responses in primate visual cortex.

Authors:  Julio C Martinez-Trujillo; Stefan Treue
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Neural fate of ignored stimuli: dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load.

Authors:  Do-Joon Yi; Geoffrey F Woodman; David Widders; René Marois; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Push-pull mechanism of selective attention in human extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  Mark A Pinsk; Glen M Doniger; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Contrast masking in human vision.

Authors:  G E Legge; J M Foley
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1980-12

10.  Orientation selectivity in the cat's striate cortex is invariant with stimulus contrast.

Authors:  G Sclar; R D Freeman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  5 in total

1.  Visual Distractors Disrupt Audiovisual Integration Regardless of Stimulus Complexity.

Authors:  Kyla D Gibney; Enimielen Aligbe; Brady A Eggleston; Sarah R Nunes; Willa G Kerkhoff; Cassandra L Dean; Leslie D Kwakye
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-20

2.  How context alters value: The brain's valuation and affective regulation system link price cues to experienced taste pleasantness.

Authors:  Liane Schmidt; Vasilisa Skvortsova; Claus Kullen; Bernd Weber; Hilke Plassmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Load-induced inattentional deafness.

Authors:  Dana Raveh; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Auditory and visual distractors disrupt multisensory temporal acuity in the crossmodal temporal order judgment task.

Authors:  Cassandra L Dean; Brady A Eggleston; Kyla David Gibney; Enimielen Aligbe; Marissa Blackwell; Leslie Dowell Kwakye
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Attention and Capacity Limits in Perception: A Cellular Metabolism Account.

Authors:  Merit Bruckmaier; Ilias Tachtsidis; Phong Phan; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 6.167

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.