Literature DB >> 18987864

Dose reduction by automatic exposure control in multidetector computed tomography: comparison between measurement and calculation.

U Lechel1, C Becker, G Langenfeld-Jäger, G Brix.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of dose reduction in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) by current-modulated automatic exposure control (AEC) and to test the reliability of the dose estimation by the conventional CT dosimetry program CT-EXPO, when an average tube current is used. Phantom measurements were performed at a CT system with 64 detector rows for four representative examination protocols, each without and with current-modulated AEC. Organ and effective doses were measured by thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLD) at an anthropomorphic Alderson phantom and compared with those given by the calculation with CT-EXPO. The application of AEC yielded dose reductions between 27 and 40% (TLD measurements). While good linearity was observed between measured and computed effective dose values both without and with AEC, the organ doses showed large deviations between measurement and calculation. The dose to patients undergoing a MDCT examination can be reduced considerably by applying a current-modulated AEC. Dosimetric algorithms using a constant current-time product provide reliable estimates of the effective dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18987864     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1204-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  12 in total

1.  [CT radiation exposure risk in Germany].

Authors:  M Galanski; H D Nagel; G Stamm
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2001-10

Review 2.  Technical approaches to the optimisation of CT.

Authors:  Willi A Kalender; Stefanie Buchenau; Paul Deak; Markus Kellermeier; Oliver Langner; Marcel van Straten; Sabrina Vollmar; Sylvia Wilharm
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 2.685

3.  American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine.

Authors:  E Stephen Amis; Priscilla F Butler; Kimberly E Applegate; Steven B Birnbaum; Libby F Brateman; James M Hevezi; Fred A Mettler; Richard L Morin; Michael J Pentecost; Geoffrey G Smith; Keith J Strauss; Robert K Zeman
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  [CT-expo--a novel program for dose evaluation in CT].

Authors:  G Stamm; H D Nagel
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2002-12

5.  Estimation of mean organ doses in diagnostic radiology from Rando phantom measurements.

Authors:  W Huda; G A Sandison
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Radiation exposure of patients undergoing whole-body dual-modality 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations.

Authors:  Gunnar Brix; Ursula Lechel; Gerhard Glatting; Sibylle I Ziegler; Wolfgang Münzing; Stefan P Müller; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Dose reduction and image quality in MDCT colonography using tube current modulation.

Authors:  A Graser; B J Wintersperger; C Suess; M F Reiser; C R Becker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  [Survey of CT practice in Japan and collective effective dose estimation].

Authors:  Kanae Nishizawa; Masaki Matsumoto; Kazuo Iwai; Takashi Maruyama
Journal:  Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  2004-03

9.  [Automatic exposure control to reduce the dose in subsecond multislice spiral CT: phantom measurements and clinical results].

Authors:  H Greess; H Wolf; C Suess; W A Kalender; W Bautz; U Baum
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2004-06

10.  Balancing radiation dose and image quality: clinical applications of neck volume CT.

Authors:  M T Russell; J R Fink; F Rebeles; K Kanal; M Ramos; Y Anzai
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  [Radiation hygiene in medical X-ray imaging: part 2: Assessment of radiation exposure and radiation protection measures].

Authors:  G Brix; R Veit; U Häusler
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Clinical evaluation of a dose monitoring software tool based on Monte Carlo Simulation in assessment of eye lens doses for cranial CT scans.

Authors:  Nika Guberina; Saravanabavaan Suntharalingam; Kai Naßenstein; Michael Forsting; Jens Theysohn; Axel Wetter; Adrian Ringelstein
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Radiation protection in radiological imaging: a survey of imaging modalities used in Japanese institutions for verifying applicator placements in high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Okamoto; Satoshi Kito; Naoki Tohyama; Shunsuke Yonai; Ryu Kawamorita; Masaru Nakamura; Takahiro Fujimoto; Syoji Tani; Akihiro Yomoda; Toru Isobe; Hiroshi Furukawa; Kikuo Kotaka; Jun Itami; Hitoshi Ikushima; Takushi Dokiya; Yoshiyuki Shioyama
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 4.  Radiation risk and protection of patients in clinical SPECT/CT.

Authors:  Gunnar Brix; Elke A Nekolla; Markus Borowski; Dietmar Noßke
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Radiation exposure in X-ray-based imaging techniques used in osteoporosis.

Authors:  John Damilakis; Judith E Adams; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Dose reduction in CT using bismuth shielding: measurements and Monte Carlo simulations.

Authors:  Kyung-Hwan Chang; Wonho Lee; Dong-Myung Choo; Choon-Sik Lee; Youhyun Kim
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 0.972

7.  Dose comparison of classical 2-plane DSA and 3D rotational angiography for the assessment of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  N Guberina; U Lechel; M Forsting; C Mönninghoff; U Dietrich; A Ringelstein
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Predicted cancer risks induced by computed tomography examinations during childhood, by a quantitative risk assessment approach.

Authors:  Neige Journy; Sophie Ancelet; Jean-Luc Rehel; Myriam Mezzarobba; Bernard Aubert; Dominique Laurier; Marie-Odile Bernier
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Comparison of full-iodine conventional CT and half-iodine virtual monochromatic imaging: advantages and disadvantages.

Authors:  Haruto Sugawara; Shigeru Suzuki; Yoshiaki Katada; Takuya Ishikawa; Rika Fukui; Yuzo Yamamoto; Osamu Abe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Patient organ and effective dose estimation in CT: comparison of four software applications.

Authors:  Cristina De Mattia; Federica Campanaro; Federica Rottoli; Paola Enrica Colombo; Andrea Pola; Angelo Vanzulli; Alberto Torresin
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2020-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.