Literature DB >> 20949346

[Radiation hygiene in medical X-ray imaging: part 2: Assessment of radiation exposure and radiation protection measures].

G Brix1, R Veit, U Häusler.   

Abstract

In order to secure and continually improve radiation protection standards in the field of medical X-ray imaging, the German X-Ray Ordinance requires that each individual examination be properly justified and that any procedure undertaken be optimized. Diagnostic reference levels have been introduced in Germany as a measure of optimization for common and/or high-dose X-ray procedures, and are regularly checked for compliance by the competent Medical Experts Office. A prerequisite for the implementation of these regulatory requirements is the determination of readily measurable dose quantities. They also form the basis for the estimation of organ doses and of the effective dose for exposure and risk assessment. The aim of this paper is to describe the essential dosimetric concepts and methods used for the assessment of radiographic, fluoroscopic, and CT procedures. In addition, practical measures for reducing the radiation exposure of patients and personnel will be discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20949346     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-009-1944-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  16 in total

1.  Radiation doses to the legs of radiologists performing interventional procedures: are they a cause for concern?

Authors:  M Whitby; C J Martin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  A study of the distribution of dose across the hands of interventional radiologists and cardiologists.

Authors:  M Whitby; C J Martin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Technical approaches to the optimisation of CT.

Authors:  Willi A Kalender; Stefanie Buchenau; Paul Deak; Markus Kellermeier; Oliver Langner; Marcel van Straten; Sabrina Vollmar; Sylvia Wilharm
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 2.685

4.  Radiation exposure of medical staff from interventional x-ray procedures: a multicentre study.

Authors:  Uwe Häusler; Renate Czarwinski; Gunnar Brix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Dose reduction by automatic exposure control in multidetector computed tomography: comparison between measurement and calculation.

Authors:  U Lechel; C Becker; G Langenfeld-Jäger; G Brix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey.

Authors:  G Brix; H D Nagel; G Stamm; R Veit; U Lechel; J Griebel; M Galanski
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Estimates of absorbed fractions for monoenergetic photon sources uniformly distributed in various organs of a heterogeneous phantom.

Authors:  W S Snyder; H L Fisher; M R Ford; G G Warner
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography.

Authors:  W A Kalender; B Schmidt; M Zankl; M Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization.

Authors:  Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael M Maher; Thomas L Toth; Leena M Hamberg; Michael A Blake; Jo-Anne Shepard; Sanjay Saini
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Eye lens exposure to radiation in interventional suites: caution is warranted.

Authors:  Eliseo Vano; Luciano Gonzalez; Jose M Fernández; Ziv J Haskal
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

1.  [Radiation hygiene in medical X-ray imaging. Part 3: radiation exposure of patients and risk assessment].

Authors:  E A Nekolla; J Griebel; G Brix
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  [Dose reduction and adequate image quality in digital radiography: a contradiction?].

Authors:  S Pötter-Lang; M Dünkelmeyer; M Uffmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  [Dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Tracer kinetics and radiation hygienic principles].

Authors:  G Brix; J Griebel; S Delorme
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.635

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.