Literature DB >> 26970990

Dose comparison of classical 2-plane DSA and 3D rotational angiography for the assessment of intracranial aneurysms.

N Guberina1, U Lechel2, M Forsting3, C Mönninghoff3, U Dietrich3, A Ringelstein3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this experimental phantom study was to compare radiation doses imparted to patients undergoing classical two-plane digital subtraction angiography (2-plane DSA) and 3D rotational angiography in interventional neuroradiology.
METHODS: Thermoluminescence dosimeter (TLD) measurements were performed at an anthropomorphic phantom using a digital interventional angiography system. Two-plane DSA included posterior/anterior (PA) and lateral (LAT) projections (frame-rate, 7.6 frames (PA) and 9.8 frames (LAT) for a scan time of approximately 8 s; image intensifier 27 cm (PA) and 25 cm (LAT)). For 3D rotational angiography, 122 images were acquired from one single image run with the imaging system rotating 240° around the phantom's head (image intensifier 37 cm).
RESULTS: Effective dose was 0.4 mSv for 2-plane DSA compared to 0.1 mSv for 3D rotational angiography. Organ doses were approximately two to five times higher for classical 2-plane technique compared to the 3D rotational angiography, respectively: brain (11.4 vs. 2.4 mSv), eye lens (4.5 vs.1 mSv), salivary glands (7 vs. 1,7 mSv), oral mucosa (2.7 vs.0.9 mSv), thyroid (0.5 vs. 0.2 mSv), thymus (0.2 vs. 0.05 mSv), bone marrow within imaged region (1 vs. 0.2 mSv), oesophagus (0.07 vs. 0.03 mSv), endotracheal system (2.6 vs. 0.7 mSv) and skeletal components in the imaged region (0.7 vs. 0.2 mSv).
CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional rotational angiography clearly reduces radiation doses compared to the classical 2-plane technique. Replacement of additional 2-plane DSA projections with 3D rotational angiography will lead to a remarkable decrease in patient radiation dose, without loss of image quality. Thus, we recommend routine application of 3D rotational angiography, in particular for diagnostic assessment of aneurysm morphology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2-plane DSA; 3D rotational angiography; Dose measurement; Effective dose; Experimental phantom study

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26970990     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-016-1671-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.804


  17 in total

1.  [Radiation exposure with 3D rotational angiography of the skull].

Authors:  D Gosch; W Kurze; F Deckert; T Schulz; A Patz; T Kahn
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2006-09

2.  Angiogram-negative subarachnoid hemorrhage in the era of three dimensional rotational angiography.

Authors:  Hideyuki Ishihara; Shoichi Kato; Tatsuo Akimura; Eiichi Suehiro; Takayuki Oku; Michiyasu Suzuki
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.961

3.  Comparison of 2D digital subtraction angiography and 3D rotational angiography in the evaluation of dome-to-neck ratio.

Authors:  W Brinjikji; H Cloft; G Lanzino; D F Kallmes
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Evaluation of the pontine perforators of the basilar artery using digital subtraction angiography in high resolution and 3D rotation technique.

Authors:  S Lescher; T Samaan; J Berkefeld
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Comparison of 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography in evaluation of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Takeshi Sugahara; Yukunori Korogi; Kouji Nakashima; Satoshi Hamatake; Shin Honda; Mutsumasa Takahashi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Patient radiation exposure during diagnostic and therapeutic interventional neuroradiology procedures.

Authors:  M D Alexander; M C Oliff; O G Olorunsola; M Brus-Ramer; E L Nickoloff; P M Meyers
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 5.836

7.  Clinical usefulness of unsubtracted 3D digital angiography compared with rotational digital angiography in the pretreatment evaluation of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Toshinori Hirai; Yukunori Korogi; Kenji Suginohara; Ken Ono; Tomohiro Nishi; Shozaburo Uemura; Masayuki Yamura; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  3D Rotational Angiography After Non-Traumatic SAH.

Authors:  A Ringelstein; O Mueller; C Mönninghoff; M L Hahnemann; U Sure; M Forsting; M Schlamann
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2014-01-29

9.  Effective dose to patient measurements in flat-detector and multislice computed tomography: a comparison of applications in neuroradiology.

Authors:  Tobias Struffert; Michael Hauer; Rosemarie Banckwitz; Christoph Köhler; Kevin Royalty; Arnd Doerfler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Additional value of 3D rotational angiography in angiographically negative aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: how negative is negative?

Authors:  W J van Rooij; J P P Peluso; M Sluzewski; G N Beute
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  4 in total

1.  CT reconstruction and MRI fusion of 3D rotational angiography in the evaluation of pediatric cerebrovascular lesions.

Authors:  Prakash Muthusami; Nicholas Shkumat; Vanessa Rea; Albert H Chiu; Manohar Shroff
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Reliability of dual- vs single-volume reconstruction of three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography for follow-up evaluation of endovascularly treated intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Nimer Adeeb; Christoph J Griessenauer; Apar S Patel; Justin Moore; Parviz Dolati-Ardejani; Raghav Gupta; Rouzbeh Motiei-Langroudi; Christopher S Ogilvy; Ajith J Thomas
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  4D Flat Panel Conebeam CTA for In Vivo Imaging of the Microvasculature of the Human Cortex with a Novel Software Prototype.

Authors:  N Huizinga; F Keil; A Birkhold; M Kowarschik; S Tritt; J Berkefeld
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  XDose: toward online cross-validation of experimental and computational X-ray dose estimation.

Authors:  Philipp Roser; Annette Birkhold; Alexander Preuhs; Philipp Ochs; Elizaveta Stepina; Norbert Strobel; Markus Kowarschik; Rebecca Fahrig; Andreas Maier
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 2.924

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.