Literature DB >> 33074329

Radiation protection in radiological imaging: a survey of imaging modalities used in Japanese institutions for verifying applicator placements in high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Hiroyuki Okamoto1, Satoshi Kito2,3,4, Naoki Tohyama5, Shunsuke Yonai6, Ryu Kawamorita7, Masaru Nakamura8, Takahiro Fujimoto9, Syoji Tani10, Akihiro Yomoda11, Toru Isobe12, Hiroshi Furukawa13, Kikuo Kotaka14, Jun Itami15, Hitoshi Ikushima16, Takushi Dokiya17, Yoshiyuki Shioyama18.   

Abstract

Institutional imaging protocols for the verification of brachytherapy applicator placements were investigated in a survey study of domestic radiotherapy institutions. The survey form designed by a free on-line survey system was distributed via the mailing-list system of the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology. Survey data of 75 institutions between August 2019 and October 2019 were collected. The imaging modalities used were dependent on resources available to the institutions. The displacement of a brachytherapy applicator results in significant dosimetric impact. It is essential to verify applicator placements using imaging modalities before treatment. Various imaging modalities used in institutions included a computed tomography (CT) scanner, an angiography X-ray system, a multi-purpose X-ray system and a radiotherapy simulator. The median total exposure time in overall treatment sessions was $\le$75 s for gynecological and prostate cancers. Some institutions used fluoroscopy to monitor the brachytherapy source movement. Institutional countermeasures for reducing unwanted imaging dose included minimizing the image area, changing the imaging orientation, reducing the imaging frequency and optimizing the imaging conditions. It is worth noting that half of the institutions did not confirm imaging dose regularly. This study reported on the usage of imaging modalities for brachytherapy in Japan. More caution should be applied with interstitial brachytherapy with many catheters that can lead to potentially substantial increments in imaging doses for monitoring the actual brachytherapy source using fluoroscopy. It is necessary to share imaging techniques, standardize imaging protocols and quality assurance/quality control among institutions, and imaging dose guidelines for optimization of imaging doses delivered in radiotherapy should be developed.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IGBT; brachytherapy; displacement; fluoroscopy; imaging dose

Year:  2021        PMID: 33074329      PMCID: PMC7779356          DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rraa088

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiat Res        ISSN: 0449-3060            Impact factor:   2.724


  25 in total

Review 1.  Dosimetry for optimisation of patient protection in computed tomography.

Authors:  K A Jessen; P C Shrimpton; J Geleijns; W Panzer; G Tosi
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  The management of imaging dose during image-guided radiotherapy: report of the AAPM Task Group 75.

Authors:  Martin J Murphy; James Balter; Stephen Balter; Jose A BenComo; Indra J Das; Steve B Jiang; C M Ma; Gustavo H Olivera; Raymond F Rodebaugh; Kenneth J Ruchala; Hiroki Shirato; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Estimating peak skin and eye lens dose from neuroperfusion examinations: use of Monte Carlo based simulations and comparisons to CTDIvol, AAPM Report No. 111, and ImPACT dosimetry tool values.

Authors:  Di Zhang; Chris H Cagnon; J Pablo Villablanca; Cynthia H McCollough; Dianna D Cody; Maria Zankl; John J Demarco; Michael F McNitt-Gray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Numerical Analysis of Organ Doses Delivered During Computed Tomography Examinations Using Japanese Adult Phantoms with the WAZA-ARI Dosimetry System.

Authors:  Fumiaki Takahashi; Kaoru Sato; Akira Endo; Koji Ono; Nobuhiko Ban; Takayuki Hasegawa; Yasushi Katsunuma; Takayasu Yoshitake; Michiaki Kai
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  Size-Specific Dose Estimates for Evaluation of Individual Patient Dose in CT Protocol for Renal Colic.

Authors:  Łukasz A Waszczuk; Maciej Guziński; Anna Czarnecka; Marek J Sąsiadek
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Real-Time Verification of a High-Dose-Rate Iridium 192 Source Position Using a Modified C-Arm Fluoroscope.

Authors:  Takayuki Nose; Masashi Chatani; Yuki Otani; Teruki Teshima; Shinichirou Kumita
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Image guidance doses delivered during radiotherapy: Quantification, management, and reduction: Report of the AAPM Therapy Physics Committee Task Group 180.

Authors:  George X Ding; Parham Alaei; Bruce Curran; Ryan Flynn; Michael Gossman; T Rock Mackie; Moyed Miften; Richard Morin; X George Xu; Timothy C Zhu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Effective radiation doses of CT examinations in Japan: a nationwide questionnaire-based study.

Authors:  Yuta Matsunaga; Ai Kawaguchi; Kenichi Kobayashi; Masanao Kobayashi; Yasuki Asada; Kazuyuki Minami; Shoichi Suzuki; Koichi Chida
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Image Quality and Lesion Detection on Deep Learning Reconstruction and Iterative Reconstruction of Submillisievert Chest and Abdominal CT.

Authors:  Ramandeep Singh; Subba R Digumarthy; Victorine V Muse; Avinash R Kambadakone; Michael A Blake; Azadeh Tabari; Yiemeng Hoi; Naruomi Akino; Erin Angel; Rachna Madan; Mannudeep K Kalra
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Inter-fractional variations in the dosimetric parameters of accelerated partial breast irradiation using a strut-adjusted volume implant.

Authors:  Kotaro Iijima; Hiroyuki Okamoto; Kana Takahashi; Ako Aikawa; Akihisa Wakita; Satoshi Nakamura; Shie Nishioka; Ken Harada; Ryoichi Notake; Akimoto Sugawara; Ryoichi Yoshimura; Etsuo Kunieda; Jun Itami
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.