Literature DB >> 18952069

Nonlinear SSVEP responses are sensitive to the perceptual binding of visual hemifields during conventional 'eye' rivalry and interocular 'percept' rivalry.

David Sutoyo1, Ramesh Srinivasan.   

Abstract

We conducted behavioral and EEG experiments to identify physiological correlates of perceptual binding during two types of binocular rivalry: (1) conventional 'eye' rivalry where perception alternates between the two monocular images presented one to each eye and (2) interocular 'percept' rivalry, where perception alternates between percepts formed by grouping complementary hemifields one from each eye. We employed 'frequency-tagging' by flickering a grating in each hemifield of each eye at different frequencies to elicit SSVEP responses specific to each hemifield of each eye. When the gratings in complementary visual fields of the two eyes were congruent in color and orientation, robust interocular 'percept' rivalry was observed with roughly equal probability to conventional 'eye' rivalry. The SSVEPs evoked by the flickering gratings were enhanced by conscious perception at both posterior and frontal electrodes only during conventional 'eye' rivalry and not during interocular 'percept' rivalry, suggesting that dominance of one eye is the basis of most previous reports of SSVEP modulation by conscious perception. We also observed nonlinear SSVEP responses at the sums of our four fundamental frequencies. These combination responses were only produced by flicker in complementary visual hemifields--in the same eye or across eyes, but never by incongruent flickering gratings that occupy the same visual field across eyes, suggesting that they are related to the binding of the visual hemifields (monocular or interocular) into a coherent percept. These combination responses were modulated by the type of rivalry experienced by the observer, but not by the specific conscious perception. Neural processes related to perceptual binding of both rival percepts take place during binocular rivalry even when only one percept is consciously perceived. This suggests that conventional 'eye' and interocular 'percept' rivalry both involve competition between percepts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18952069      PMCID: PMC2676901          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.09.086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  30 in total

1.  Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  A Polonsky; R Blake; J Braun; D J Heeger
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Rival ideas about binocular rivalry.

Authors:  S H Lee; R Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  F Tong; K Nakayama; J T Vaughan; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  I Kovács; T V Papathomas; M Yang; A Fehér
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-12-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization.

Authors:  D L Sheinberg; N K Logothetis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?

Authors:  N K Logothetis; D A Leopold; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Binocular rivalry occurs without simultaneous presentation of rival stimuli.

Authors:  R P O'Shea; B Crassini
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-09

9.  Intermodulation components of the visual evoked potential: responses to lateral and superimposed stimuli.

Authors:  V Zemon; F Ratliff
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Binocular rivalry is partly resolved at early processing stages with steady and with flickering presentation: a human event-related brain potential study.

Authors:  Urte Roeber; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review.

Authors:  Anthony M Norcia; L Gregory Appelbaum; Justin M Ales; Benoit R Cottereau; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Temporal dynamics of divided spatial attention.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Javier O Garcia; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Individual differences in attention strategies during detection, fine discrimination, and coarse discrimination.

Authors:  David A Bridwell; Elizabeth A Hecker; John T Serences; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Binocular rivalry requires visual attention.

Authors:  Peng Zhang; Keith Jamison; Stephen Engel; Bin He; Sheng He
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Contrast Normalization Accounts for Binocular Interactions in Human Striate and Extra-striate Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Spero C Nicholas; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Scale and frequency chauvinism in brain dynamics: too much emphasis on γ band oscillations.

Authors:  Paul L Nunez; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 3.270

7.  The enhanced information flow from visual cortex to frontal area facilitates SSVEP response: evidence from model-driven and data-driven causality analysis.

Authors:  Fali Li; Yin Tian; Yangsong Zhang; Kan Qiu; Chunyang Tian; Wei Jing; Tiejun Liu; Yang Xia; Daqing Guo; Dezhong Yao; Peng Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Semantic Wavelet-Induced Frequency-Tagging (SWIFT) Periodically Activates Category Selective Areas While Steadily Activating Early Visual Areas.

Authors:  Roger Koenig-Robert; Rufin VanRullen; Naotsugu Tsuchiya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Conflict-sensitive neurons gate interocular suppression in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Sucharit Katyal; Mark Vergeer; Sheng He; Bin He; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Cortical network properties revealed by SSVEP in anesthetized rats.

Authors:  Peng Xu; Chunyang Tian; Yangsong Zhang; Wei Jing; Zhenyu Wang; Tiejun Liu; Jun Hu; Yin Tian; Yang Xia; Dezhong Yao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.