Literature DB >> 6522219

Binocular rivalry occurs without simultaneous presentation of rival stimuli.

R P O'Shea, B Crassini.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1984        PMID： 6522219     DOI： 10.3758/bf03206368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN： 0031-5117


× No keyword cloud information.
  23 in total

1.  Sensitive period for the development of human binocular vision.

Authors:  M S Banks; R N Aslin; R D Letson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-11-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  STEREOSCOPIC DEPTH PERCEPTION AND EXPOSURE DELAY BETWEEN IMAGES TO THE TWO EYES.

Authors:  K N OGLE
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1963-11

3.  A theory of binocular fusion.

Authors:  P C DODWELL; G R ENGEL
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1963-04-06       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Letter: The effect of strabismus on dichoptic summation of form information.

Authors:  R Willians
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  An investigation of visual responses to brief stereoscopic stimuli.

Authors:  G R Engel
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Stereoscopic depth and binocular rivalry.

Authors:  K N Ogle; J M Wakefield
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Further developments in binocular summation.

Authors:  R Blake; M Sloane; R Fox
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-09

8.  The effect of contrast on the completeness of binocular rivalry suppression.

Authors:  M Hollins
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-06

9.  Stereopsis and binocular rivalry from dichoptic stereograms.

Authors:  M M Levy; R B Lawson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Humans deprived of normal binocular vision have binocular interactions tuned to size and orientation.

Authors:  D M Levi; R S Harwerth; E L Smith
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-11-16       Impact factor: 47.728
View more
  14 in total

1.  Visual sensitivity underlying changes in visual consciousness.

Authors:  David Alais; John Cass; Robert P O'Shea; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  MEG phase follows conscious perception during binocular rivalry induced by visual stream segregation.

Authors:  Ramesh Srinivasan; Sanja Petrovic
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Temporal events in cyclopean vision.

Authors:  T J Andrews; L E White; D Binder; D Purves
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A nonlinear systems approach to Fechner's paradox.

Authors:  R A Gregson
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Dichoptic temporal frequency differences do not lead to binocular rivalry.

Authors:  R P O'Shea; R Blake
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-01

6.  Nonlinear SSVEP responses are sensitive to the perceptual binding of visual hemifields during conventional 'eye' rivalry and interocular 'percept' rivalry.

Authors:  David Sutoyo; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Binocular Rivalry Stimuli are Common but Rivalry is not.

Authors:  Robert Paul O'Shea
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Temporal analysis of image-rivalry suppression.

Authors:  Rishi Bhardwaj; Robert P O'Shea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Can eye of origin serve as a deviant? Visual mismatch negativity from binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Manja van Rhijn; Urte Roeber; Robert P O'Shea
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The role of temporally coarse form processing during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Jeroen J A van Boxtel; David Alais; Casper J Erkelens; Raymond van Ee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.