Literature DB >> 23390315

Temporal dynamics of divided spatial attention.

Sirawaj Itthipuripat1, Javier O Garcia, John T Serences.   

Abstract

In naturalistic settings, observers often have to monitor multiple objects dispersed throughout the visual scene. However, the degree to which spatial attention can be divided across spatially noncontiguous objects has long been debated, particularly when those objects are in close proximity. Moreover, the temporal dynamics of divided attention are unclear: is the process of dividing spatial attention gradual and continuous, or does it onset in a discrete manner? To address these issues, we recorded steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs) as subjects covertly monitored two flickering targets while ignoring an intervening distractor that flickered at a different frequency. All three stimuli were clustered within either the lower left or the lower right quadrant, and our dependent measure was SSVEP power at the target and distractor frequencies measured over time. In two experiments, we observed a temporally discrete increase in power for target- vs. distractor-evoked SSVEPs extending from ∼350 to 150 ms prior to correct (but not incorrect) responses. The divergence in SSVEP power immediately prior to a correct response suggests that spatial attention can be divided across noncontiguous locations, even when the targets are closely spaced within a single quadrant. In addition, the division of spatial attention appears to be relatively discrete, as opposed to slow and continuous. Finally, the predictive relationship between SSVEP power and behavior demonstrates that these neurophysiological measures of divided attention are meaningfully related to cognitive function.

Keywords:  attention; decision making; electroencephalography; steady-state visual evoked potentials

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23390315      PMCID: PMC3652224          DOI: 10.1152/jn.01051.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  47 in total

1.  The neural basis of the bilateral distribution advantage.

Authors:  Stefan Pollmann; Eran Zaidel; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Splitting focal attention.

Authors:  U Castiello; C Umiltà
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Behavioral performance follows the time course of neural facilitation and suppression during cued shifts of feature-selective attention.

Authors:  S K Andersen; M M Müller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Interhemispheric resource sharing: decreasing benefits with increasing processing efficiency.

Authors:  Marianne Maertens; Stefan Pollmann
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Sustained division of spatial attention to multiple locations within one hemifield.

Authors:  Peter Malinowski; Sandra Fuchs; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

7.  The selectivity of task-dependent attention varies with surrounding context.

Authors:  Yee-Joon Kim; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: an electrophysiological analysis.

Authors:  H J Heinze; S J Luck; T F Münte; A Gös; G R Mangun; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-07

9.  Attention and the detection of signals.

Authors:  M I Posner; C R Snyder; B J Davidson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-06

10.  Electroencephalographic brain dynamics following manually responded visual targets.

Authors:  Scott Makeig; Arnaud Delorme; Marissa Westerfield; Tzyy-Ping Jung; Jeanne Townsend; Eric Courchesne; Terrence J Sejnowski
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  11 in total

1.  A novel EEG paradigm to simultaneously and rapidly assess the functioning of auditory and visual pathways.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Andrew S Kessler; Laurel A Lawyer; David P Corina; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Changing the spatial scope of attention alters patterns of neural gain in human cortex.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Javier O Garcia; Nuttida Rungratsameetaweemana; Thomas C Sprague; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Transcranial direct-current stimulation modulates offline visual oscillatory activity: A magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; Timothy J McDermott; Mackenzie S Mills; Nathan M Coolidge; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  When Conflict Cannot be Avoided: Relative Contributions of Early Selection and Frontal Executive Control in Mitigating Stroop Conflict.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Sean Deering; John T Serences
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Combining spatial and temporal expectations to improve visual perception.

Authors:  Gustavo Rohenkohl; Ian C Gould; Jéssica Pessoa; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Graded Neuronal Modulations Related to Visual Spatial Attention.

Authors:  J Patrick Mayo; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Attention to Multiple Objects Facilitates Their Integration in Prefrontal and Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  Yee-Joon Kim; Jeffrey J Tsai; Jeffrey Ojemann; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Expectations Do Not Alter Early Sensory Processing during Perceptual Decision-Making.

Authors:  Nuttida Rungratsameetaweemana; Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Annalisa Salazar; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Driving steady-state visual evoked potentials at arbitrary frequencies using temporal interpolation of stimulus presentation.

Authors:  Søren K Andersen; Matthias M Müller
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Two different mechanisms support selective attention at different phases of training.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Anna Byers; John T Serences
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.