Literature DB >> 15500965

Binocular rivalry is partly resolved at early processing stages with steady and with flickering presentation: a human event-related brain potential study.

Urte Roeber1, Erich Schröger.   

Abstract

When their two eyes are presented with radically different images, observers report a fluctuation in perception between those images. This phenomenon, i.e. that only one image dominates the percept at a time, is termed binocular rivalry. Consequently, when rivalrous stimulation is changed into non-rivalrous stimulation, it depends on the image that has been currently dominant whether a change in perception occurs (incompatible change) or not (compatible change). That is, the perceptual experience differs although the physical input is the same, namely the stimulus of one eye has been changed. In the event-related brain potential (ERP) to compatible and incompatible changes we found differences as early as in the P1-N1-range, suggesting that in humans the binocular rivalry phenomenon is already (partly) resolved in extrastriate visual areas latest. Moreover, similar results were obtained with steady and flickering stimulus presentation showing that the processes involved in dealing with competing visual input do not depend critically on stimulus presentation mode.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15500965     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.08.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  11 in total

1.  Preceding stimulus awareness augments offset-evoked potentials: evidence from motion-induced blindness.

Authors:  Werner Klotz; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-26

2.  Compatibility between stimulated eye, target location and response location.

Authors:  Andrea Schankin; Fernando Valle-Inclán; Steven A Hackley
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-06-12

3.  Endogenous attention selection during binocular rivalry at early stages of visual processing.

Authors:  Jyoti Mishra; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Binocular vision.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Hugh Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Spatial frequency impacts perceptual and attentional ERP components across cultures.

Authors:  Tong Lin; Xin Zhang; Eric C Fields; Robert Sekuler; Angela Gutchess
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Nonlinear SSVEP responses are sensitive to the perceptual binding of visual hemifields during conventional 'eye' rivalry and interocular 'percept' rivalry.

Authors:  David Sutoyo; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  On the role of attention in binocular rivalry: electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Urte Roeber; Sandra Veser; Erich Schröger; Robert P O'Shea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Predicting visual consciousness electrophysiologically from intermittent binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Robert P O'Shea; Jürgen Kornmeier; Urte Roeber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Do early neural correlates of visual consciousness show the oblique effect? A binocular rivalry and event-related potential study.

Authors:  Bradley N Jack; Urte Roeber; Robert P O'Shea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Can eye of origin serve as a deviant? Visual mismatch negativity from binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Manja van Rhijn; Urte Roeber; Robert P O'Shea
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.