Literature DB >> 21791293

Binocular rivalry requires visual attention.

Peng Zhang1, Keith Jamison, Stephen Engel, Bin He, Sheng He.   

Abstract

An interocular conflict arises when different images are presented to each eye at the same spatial location. The visual system resolves this conflict through binocular rivalry: observers consciously perceive spontaneous alternations between the two images. Visual attention is generally important for resolving competition between neural representations. However, given the seemingly spontaneous and automatic nature of binocular rivalry, the role of attention in resolving interocular competition remains unclear. Here we test whether visual attention is necessary to produce rivalry. Using an EEG frequency-tagging method to track cortical representations of the conflicting images, we show that when attention was diverted away, rivalry stopped. The EEG data further suggested that the neural representations of the dichoptic images combined without attention. Thus, attention is necessary for dichoptic images to be engaged in sustained rivalry and may be generally required for resolving conflicting, potentially ambiguous input and giving a single interpretation access to consciousness.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21791293      PMCID: PMC3175243          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  28 in total

1.  Spatial attention improves the quality of population codes in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Sameer Saproo; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sang Chul Chong; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Spatiotemporal analysis of the cortical sources of the steady-state visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Francesco Di Russo; Sabrina Pitzalis; Teresa Aprile; Grazia Spitoni; Fabiana Patria; Alessandra Stella; Donatella Spinelli; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Attention speeds binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Chris L E Paffen; David Alais; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2006-09

5.  Spatial attention can modulate unconscious orientation processing.

Authors:  Bahador Bahrami; David Carmel; Vincent Walsh; Geraint Rees; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Development of rivalry and dichoptic masking in human infants.

Authors:  R J Brown; T R Candy; A M Norcia
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Nonlinear SSVEP responses are sensitive to the perceptual binding of visual hemifields during conventional 'eye' rivalry and interocular 'percept' rivalry.

Authors:  David Sutoyo; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Inter-ocular contrast normalization in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Farshad Moradi; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Hierarchy of cortical responses underlying binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Lee; Randolph Blake; David J Heeger
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  The role of voluntary and involuntary attention in selecting perceptual dominance during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sarah Hancock; Timothy J Andrews
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  64 in total

1.  SSVEP signatures of binocular rivalry during simultaneous EEG and fMRI.

Authors:  Keith W Jamison; Abhrajeet V Roy; Sheng He; Stephen A Engel; Bin He
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Fearful faces heighten the cortical representation of contextual threat.

Authors:  Matthias J Wieser; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review.

Authors:  Anthony M Norcia; L Gregory Appelbaum; Justin M Ales; Benoit R Cottereau; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Attention model of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Li; James Rankin; John Rinzel; Marisa Carrasco; David J Heeger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Perceptual training profoundly alters binocular rivalry through both sensory and attentional enhancements.

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Michael D Melnick; Duje Tadin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Frequency of alpha oscillation predicts individual differences in perceptual stability during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sucharit Katyal; Sheng He; Bin He; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Can binocular rivalry reveal neural correlates of consciousness?

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Jan Brascamp; David J Heeger
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Binocular rivalry from invisible patterns.

Authors:  Jinyou Zou; Sheng He; Peng Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Does visual attention drive the dynamics of bistable perception?

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Jan Brascamp; Duje Tadin; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Normalization regulates competition for visual awareness.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.