Literature DB >> 18835390

Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection.

Mandeep S Sawhney1, Marcelo S Cury, Naama Neeman, Long H Ngo, Janet M Lewis, Ram Chuttani, Douglas K Pleskow, Mark D Aronson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Practice guidelines recommend that endoscopists spend at least 7 minutes examining the colonic mucosa during colonoscopy withdrawal to optimize polyp yield. The aim of this study was to determine if the implementation of an institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes was associated with an increase in colon polyp detection.
METHODS: All 42 endoscopists at our institute were asked to attain a colonoscopy withdrawal time of at least 7 minutes. Compliance with 7-minute withdrawal time was recorded for all nontherapeutic colonoscopies. Polyp detection ratio (number of polyps detected divided by number of colonoscopies performed) was computed. Regression models were used to assess the association between compliance with 7-minute withdrawal time and polyp detection.
RESULTS: During the study period, 23,910 colonoscopies were performed. The average age of patients was 56.8 years, and 54% were female. Colon cancer screening or surveillance was the indication for 42.5% of colonoscopies. At the beginning of the study, the polyp detection ratio was 0.48. Compliance with 7-minute withdrawal time for nontherapeutic procedures increased from 65% at the beginning of the initiative to almost 100%. However, no increase in polyp detection ratio was noted over the same period for all polyps (slope, 0.0006; P = .45) or for polyps 1-5 mm (slope, 0.001; P = .26), 6-9 mm (slope, 0.002; P = .43), or > or = 10 mm (slope, 0.006; P = .13). No association was detected when only colonoscopies performed for screening or surveillance were analyzed.
CONCLUSIONS: An institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes had no effect on colon polyp detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18835390     DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  52 in total

1.  Removal of infused water predominantly during insertion (water exchange) is consistently associated with an increase in adenoma detection rate - review of data in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of water-related methods.

Authors:  Fw Leung; Jo Harker; Jw Leung; Rm Siao-Salera; Sk Mann; Fc Ramirez; S Friedland; A Amato; F Radaelli; S Paggi; V Terruzzi; Yh Hsieh
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-01

2.  Trainees' adenoma detection rate is higher if ≥ 10 minutes is spent on withdrawal during colonoscopy.

Authors:  Mark A Gromski; Christopher A Miller; Suck-Ho Lee; Eun Seo Park; Tae Hoon Lee; Sang-Heum Park; Il-Kwun Chung; Sun-Joo Kim; Young Hwangbo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Endoscopy and polyps-diagnostic and therapeutic advances in management.

Authors:  Scott R Steele; Eric K Johnson; Bradley Champagne; Brad Davis; Sang Lee; David Rivadeneira; Howard Ross; Dana A Hayden; Justin A Maykel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Quality in Colonoscopy.

Authors:  Katherine T Brunner; Audrey H Calderwood
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2015-10

Review 5.  Achieving competence in colonoscopy: Milestones and the need for a new endoscopic curriculum in gastroenterology training.

Authors:  Sara B Stanford; Stephanie Lee; Candace Masaquel; Robert H Lee
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10

6.  The increasing importance of quality measures for trainees.

Authors:  Sameer D Saini; Akbar K Waljee; Philip Schoenfeld; Eve A Kerr; Sandeep Vijan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Benchmarking and quality-screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Felix W Leung
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-01

8.  Quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen
Journal:  Tech Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-04

9.  Quality colonoscopy: a matter of time, technique or technology?

Authors:  Robert H Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Relationship between detection of adenomas by flexible sigmoidoscopy and interval distal colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shari S Rogal; Paul F Pinsky; Robert E Schoen
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.