Literature DB >> 22083333

Trainees' adenoma detection rate is higher if ≥ 10 minutes is spent on withdrawal during colonoscopy.

Mark A Gromski1, Christopher A Miller, Suck-Ho Lee, Eun Seo Park, Tae Hoon Lee, Sang-Heum Park, Il-Kwun Chung, Sun-Joo Kim, Young Hwangbo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that prolonged colonoscopic withdrawal times (WT; >6 min) are beneficial for the adenoma detection rate (ADR) for experienced endoscopists. There are little data, however, to guide the appropriate colonoscopic withdrawal times for trainees. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a relationship between WTs and ADR for first-year fellows training in colonoscopy.
METHODS: This is a prospective study of first-year gastroenterology fellows at a single academic teaching hospital who documented each colonoscopy with a self-report form over the course of an academic year (March 2010 to February 2011). The internal policy for the trainees was to have at least a 6-min withdrawal time for each colonoscopy.
RESULTS: Four first-year fellows in gastroenterology at an academic medical center completed self-reports for 1,210 colonoscopies. Mean WT was 10.2 ± 3.4 min. The aggregate polyp detection rate was 33.2% and the aggregate ADR was 22.3%. For colonoscopies with WT < 10 min, ADR was 9.5%, and for colonoscopies with WT ≥ 10 min, ADR was 32.3% (p < 0.001). When the quality indicator of 25% goal ADR for males and 15% goal ADR for females is applied, this aggregate rate is achieved for both sexes for screening colonoscopies (n = 676) with WT ≥ 10 min.
CONCLUSIONS: First-year trainees had a significantly higher ADR if their colonoscopic WT is ≥ 10 min.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22083333     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-2033-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  23 in total

1.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John L Petrini; Todd H Baron; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan Cohen; Stephen E Deal; Brenda Hoffman; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Bret T Petersen; Michael A Safdi; Douglas O Faigel; Irving M Pike
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; John L Petrini; Todd H Baron; Amitabh Chak; Jonathan Cohen; Stephen E Deal; Brenda Hoffman; Brian C Jacobson; Klaus Mergener; Bret T Petersen; Michael A Safdi; Douglas O Faigel; Irving M Pike
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  The impact of endoscopists' experience and learning curves and interendoscopist variation on colonoscopy completion rates.

Authors:  G Dafnis; F Granath; L Påhlman; H Hannuksela; A Ekbom; P Blomqvist
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates.

Authors:  D K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

Authors:  Florian Froehlich; Vincent Wietlisbach; Jean-Jacques Gonvers; Bernard Burnand; John-Paul Vader
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  An adequate level of training for technical competence in screening and diagnostic colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter evaluation of the learning curve.

Authors:  Suck-Ho Lee; Il-Kwun Chung; Sun-Joo Kim; Jin-Oh Kim; Bong-Min Ko; Young Hwangbo; Won Ho Kim; Dong Hun Park; Sang Kil Lee; Cheol Hee Park; Il-Hyun Baek; Dong Il Park; Seun-Ja Park; Jeong-Seon Ji; Byung-Ik Jang; Yoon-Tae Jeen; Jeong Eun Shin; Jeong-Sik Byeon; Chang-Soo Eun; Dong Soo Han
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  The influence of timing of colonoscopy on adenoma detection: is timing everything?

Authors:  Joseph Vicari
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence.

Authors:  Bret J Spier; Mark Benson; Patrick R Pfau; Gregory Nelligan; Michael R Lucey; Eric A Gaumnitz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection.

Authors:  Mandeep S Sawhney; Marcelo S Cury; Naama Neeman; Long H Ngo; Janet M Lewis; Ram Chuttani; Douglas K Pleskow; Mark D Aronson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Robert L Barclay; Joseph J Vicari; Roger L Greenlaw
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 11.382

View more
  10 in total

1.  In response to: Singh S, "Colonoscopy withdrawal time and adenoma detection rates for trainees".

Authors:  M A Gromski; S H Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Colonoscopy withdrawal time and adenoma detection rates for trainees.

Authors:  Shailendra Singh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Trainee colonoscopists fulfil quality standards for the detection of adenomatous polyps.

Authors:  Peter Klare; Stefan Ascher; Stefan Wagenpfeil; Daniel Rapp; Monther Bajbouj; Bruno Neu; Roland M Schmid; Stefan von Delius
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Can We Measure the Learning Curve of Colonoscopy Using Polyp Detection Rate?

Authors:  Jin Young Yoon; Jae Myung Cha
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2016-01-28

Review 5.  Expert opinions and scientific evidence for colonoscopy key performance indicators.

Authors:  Colin J Rees; Roisin Bevan; Katharina Zimmermann-Fraedrich; Matthew D Rutter; Douglas Rex; Evelien Dekker; Thierry Ponchon; Michael Bretthauer; Jaroslaw Regula; Brian Saunders; Cesare Hassan; Michael J Bourke; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  UK key performance indicators and quality assurance standards for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Colin J Rees; Siwan Thomas Gibson; Matt D Rutter; Phil Baragwanath; Rupert Pullan; Mark Feeney; Neil Haslam
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  The efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy performed by a single endoscopist in patients after colorectal resection.

Authors:  Im-Kyung Kim; Jeonghyun Kang; Seung Hyuk Baik; Kang Young Lee; Seung-Kook Sohn
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Determination of withdrawal times in individualized opportunistic screening colonoscopies.

Authors:  Qiang Zhan; Li Xiang; Xinhua Zhao; Shengli An; Yongbai Zhou; Yangzhi Xu; Aimin Li; Side Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Adenoma detection in patients undergoing a comprehensive colonoscopy screening.

Authors:  Gottumukkala S Raju; Vikram Vadyala; Rebecca Slack; Somashekar G Krishna; William A Ross; Patrick M Lynch; Robert S Bresalier; Ernest Hawk; John R Stroehlein
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Screening colonoscopy: should we focus more on technique and less on technology?

Authors:  Noor Mohammed; Venkataraman Subramanian
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2013-08-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.