Literature DB >> 26675559

Achieving competence in colonoscopy: Milestones and the need for a new endoscopic curriculum in gastroenterology training.

Sara B Stanford1, Stephanie Lee1, Candace Masaquel1, Robert H Lee1.   

Abstract

Colonoscopy is considered to be the most effective tool for reducing colorectal cancer (CRC) morbidity and mortality. As a result, certifying trainee competence in the performance of colonoscopy is critical to maximizing CRC screening and prevention efforts. Guidelines on training and accreditation around the world have been revised to emphasize the attainment of milestones in the technical and cognitive skills necessary to perform the procedure. To meet this challenge, new evaluation systems have been developed to measure trainee competence through all aspects of colonoscopy training. These changes stem from increased recognition that procedural numbers alone do not necessarily guarantee trainees' proficiency in the performance of colonoscopy. Variability in endoscopic practice and in CRC screening outcomes also point to deficiencies in the current approach towards colonoscopy instruction. However, technological innovations hold great promise in training endoscopists to perform high quality colonoscopy. Furthermore, potential advances in the use of feedback as a training tool provide new avenues for research. This review summarizes the latest evidence on the effort to define, evaluate and promote the achievement of competence in colonoscopy among trainees.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cecal intubation; Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Competence; Core curriculum

Year:  2015        PMID: 26675559      PMCID: PMC4673390          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i18.1279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  40 in total

1.  Surgical resident's training in colonoscopy: numbers, competency, and perceptions.

Authors:  Bret J Spier; Emily T Durkin; Andrew J Walker; Eugene Foley; Eric A Gaumnitz; Patrick R Pfau
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity.

Authors:  Laura C Seeff; Thomas B Richards; Jean A Shapiro; Marion R Nadel; Diane L Manninen; Leslie S Given; Fred B Dong; Linda D Winges; Matthew T McKenna
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Training to competency in colonoscopy: assessing and defining competency standards.

Authors:  Robert E Sedlack
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Position statement. Maintaining competency in endoscopic skills. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  The European Diploma of Gastroenterology: progress towards harmonization of standards.

Authors:  A D Beattie; M Greff; V Lamy; C N Mallinson
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.566

Review 6.  Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Philip S Schoenfeld; Jonathan Cohen; Irving M Pike; Douglas G Adler; M Brian Fennerty; John G Lieb; Walter G Park; Maged K Rizk; Mandeep S Sawhney; Nicholas J Shaheen; Sachin Wani; David S Weinberg
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Water immersion versus standard colonoscopy insertion technique: randomized trial shows promise for minimal sedation.

Authors:  C W Leung; T Kaltenbach; R Soetikno; K K Wu; F W Leung; S Friedland
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates.

Authors:  D K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  A tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates during endoscopic training: a venture into uncharted territory.

Authors:  Craig A Munroe; Philip Lee; Andrew Copland; Kuan K Wu; Tonya Kaltenbach; Roy M Soetikno; Shai Friedland
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  An adequate level of training for technical competence in screening and diagnostic colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter evaluation of the learning curve.

Authors:  Suck-Ho Lee; Il-Kwun Chung; Sun-Joo Kim; Jin-Oh Kim; Bong-Min Ko; Young Hwangbo; Won Ho Kim; Dong Hun Park; Sang Kil Lee; Cheol Hee Park; Il-Hyun Baek; Dong Il Park; Seun-Ja Park; Jeong-Seon Ji; Byung-Ik Jang; Yoon-Tae Jeen; Jeong Eun Shin; Jeong-Sik Byeon; Chang-Soo Eun; Dong Soo Han
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Colorectal cancer screening in countries of European Council outside of the EU-28.

Authors:  Emma Altobelli; Francesco D'Aloisio; Paolo Matteo Angeletti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Prospective comparison of an adult, an intermediate pediatric and a long pediatric colonoscope in the training process of gastrointestinal fellows to achieve high-quality practice in colonoscopy.

Authors:  George Tribonias; Athanasios-Dimitrios Bacasis; Yoriaki Komeda; George Lyrakos; Ioannis Giotis; Niki Daferera; Dimitrios Charisis; Margarita-Eleni Manola; Dimitrios Karapiperis
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-05-12

3.  Trends in UK endoscopy training in the BSG trainees' national survey and strategic planning for the future.

Authors:  Sujata Biswas; Laith Alrubaiy; Louise China; Melanie Lockett; Antony Ellis; Neil Hawkes
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-09-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.