Literature DB >> 25157667

The increasing importance of quality measures for trainees.

Sameer D Saini1, Akbar K Waljee2, Philip Schoenfeld2, Eve A Kerr2, Sandeep Vijan2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25157667      PMCID： PMC4426945          DOI： 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.08.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN： 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


× No keyword cloud information.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.

Authors:  Noah Ivers; Gro Jamtvedt; Signe Flottorp; Jane M Young; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Simon D French; Mary Ann O'Brien; Marit Johansen; Jeremy Grimshaw; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

2.  Monitoring performance for blood pressure management among patients with diabetes mellitus: too much of a good thing?

Authors:  Eve A Kerr; Michelle A Lucatorto; Rob Holleman; Mary M Hogan; Mandi L Klamerus; Timothy P Hofer
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2012-06-25

Review 3.  Effectiveness of teaching quality improvement to clinicians: a systematic review.

Authors:  Romsai T Boonyasai; Donna M Windish; Chayan Chakraborti; Leonard S Feldman; Haya R Rubin; Eric B Bass
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos).

Authors:  Robert H Lee; Raymond S Tang; V Raman Muthusamy; Samuel B Ho; Nimeesh K Shah; Laura Wetzel; Andrew S Bain; Erin E Mackintosh; Aeri M Paek; Ana Maria Crissien; Lida Jafari Saraf; Denise M Kalmaz; Thomas J Savides
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 9.427

5.  Knowledge of quality performance measures associated with endoscopy among gastroenterology trainees and the impact of a web-based intervention.

Authors:  Jennifer S Thompson; Benjamin Lebwohl; Sapna Syngal; Fay Kastrinos
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Can the adenoma detection rate reliably identify low-performing endoscopists? Results of a modeling study.

Authors:  Sameer D Saini; Philip Schoenfeld; Sandeep Vijan
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Evaluating the quality of medical care.

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q       Date:  1966-07

8.  Avoiding pitfalls in chronic disease quality measurement: a case for the next generation of technical quality measures.

Authors:  E A Kerr; S L Krein; S Vijan; T P Hofer; R A Hayward
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.229

9.  Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection.

Authors:  Mandeep S Sawhney; Marcelo S Cury; Naama Neeman; Long H Ngo; Janet M Lewis; Ram Chuttani; Douglas K Pleskow; Mark D Aronson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death.

Authors:  Douglas A Corley; Christopher D Jensen; Amy R Marks; Wei K Zhao; Jeffrey K Lee; Chyke A Doubeni; Ann G Zauber; Jolanda de Boer; Bruce H Fireman; Joanne E Schottinger; Virginia P Quinn; Nirupa R Ghai; Theodore R Levin; Charles P Quesenberry
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 91.245
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.